The North Carolina Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. Hickman (COA24-893, filed November 5, 2025) revisits a foundational
question in constitutional law. When government agents enter private property without a warrant, what happens to the evidence they obtain?
While the case involves a Department of Revenue tax warrant rather than a traditional criminal investigation, its implications extend beyond tax collection. It clarifies the continuing role of the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 20 of the North Carolina Constitution in protecting private dwellings from unauthorized searches and seizures.
The opinion also reaffirms an older, quieter truth that sometimes gets lost in modern exclusionary-rule debate.
Carolina Criminal Defense & DUI Lawyer Updates
sympathy.
defendant’s own serious misconduct effectively forfeits the right to an attorney. Unlike a waiver, which is a voluntary relinquishment of a known right, forfeiture does not require an informed choice by the defendant – it is a consequence of behavior that is incompatible with the continued services of counsel.
DUI charges or other criminal matters where BAC plays a role, understanding hemolysis, BAC testing, and its implications can help in reviewing the evidence.
inaccurate or misleading BAC when the decedent—who, in criminal cases, may be considered a victim—had alcohol in their system.