Articles Tagged with north carolina criminal defense

by

Atkinson, a Pender County municipality, appears to have adopted North Carolina’s first Flock camera ban, with an ordinance prohibiting automated license plate reader cameras within its corporate limits. WECT reports that commissioners approved the ordinance October 1, 2026, with an October 2 effective date, and describes it as the first prohibition of its kind in the state. Even in small-town North Carolina, a “Flock ban” raises legal issues that go well beyond whether a local group of politicos wants or likes police surveillance, in whatever form it may take. Whether a town can prohibit a private property owner from installing an automated license plate reader on the owner’s own land is problematic at best.

Two legal issues deserve consideration before anyone draws a conclusion from the vote. The first separates a town controlling its own equipment from a town prohibiting private installations. The second concerns terminology. “Flock camera” has become a catch-all term for every ALPR and ordinary video system on the market, including equipment no government agency owns or maintains, and the label does not tell you what a particular camera does. If you own a restaurant, a store, or a parking lot, that difference may matter. A camera recording a cashier is not an automated license plate reader. A homeowners association system that uses software to read plates as vehicles enter and leave a neighborhood and the surrounding roads, an arrangement more common than most drivers realize, is exactly the kind of private installation the ordinance appears to reach, even if unintentionally so.

A town ordinance also has a geographic limit. Atkinson’s action clearly does not create a statewide prohibition on restaurant or retail security cameras. The question is what Atkinson can prohibit within its own jurisdiction, and whether its authority supports the prohibition it adopted. One might reasonably infer a general prohibition is subject to challenge as overbroad and void for vagueness. It reaches independently operated private equipment without exception, and it supplies no definition of the cameras it bans, leaving enforcement officials to decide what qualifies. Indeed, the ordinance does not specify a penalty for noncompliance. State law enacted by the General Assembly may also preempt a local ordinance of that scope.

Continue reading

by

A day in the life of a criminal defense lawyer can change before the first cup of coffee is finished.  On a recent Tuesday, my schedule for the day was turned upside down somewhere right after I settled in to get some much needed paperwork and thinking time done.

The day began around 5:00 a.m., which is not all that unusual for me. I like the quiet hours of the morning, before the sun has made an appearance. I start the coffee for me and my wife, read new appellate opinions, review files, write legal materials, and think through what the day and the rest of the week may bring. Before the phones begin ringing off the hook and the courthouse fills with law enforcement, judges, prosecutors, witnesses, and defense lawyers, there is time to concentrate and just think without distractions.

Court Settings in North Carolina How the Court Sessions Can Work and What It Means
Mecklenburg Administrative Criminal Court Courtrooms such as 1130 and 1150 handle misdemeanor and traffic administration, first appearances, and felony administrative matters. The appearance may address custody, scheduling, or case management rather than a contested trial.
Mecklenburg trial courtroom “A” session The morning calendar in a fourth-floor trial courtroom, such as 4150A, 4170A, or 4310A. It usually begins at 9:00 a.m. and runs to about noon.
Mecklenburg trial courtroom “B” session A different afternoon calendar assigned to the same physical courtroom. It usually begins at 1:30 p.m. and may continue to about 5:00 p.m.
Surrounding county district courts One session that begins in the morning and continues through the day. A case may not be reached until afternoon even though everyone reports for the morning calendar call.
Superior Court A criminal session may open in the morning and run through the week. Felony trials, misdemeanor appeals, arraignments, and pleas follow a separate schedule that may include assigned time slots within the term.

To be fair, my work does not really begin at 5:00 a.m. Preparation for a criminal defense case starts weeks, and sometimes months, earlier. Defense lawyers review the charging documents, available discovery, witness statements, body-camera video, photographs, law enforcement summaries and police narratives, and case file materials that may be part of our defense strategy in the case. For district court criminal charges, there isn’t a lot of legal research or case law that is required, but on occasion it doesn’t hurt to take a look at the most recent probable cause decisions or an interesting NC Court of Appeals ruling. Long before the morning of court, we’ve reviewed the essential elements of the charge against the likely evidence at trial. We consider, weigh, and then reconsider potential evidentiary issues, key questions to ask on cross, defenses, and possible resolutions well before anyone walks into a courtroom. That’s very much part of being in a “learned profession.”  We’re always thinking and planning, getting ready for sudden changes, new evidence, and anticipating the expected unexpected twists and turns of court.

Preparation does not always mean predicting one path and hoping the case follows it. Quite the contrary is true for defense lawyers. It means preparing for several different pathways. A case may be continued to another date, or negotiated for deferred prosecution or some other sort of conditional discharge; a charge might be dismissed; and if the allegations cannot be resolved by a non-trial disposition, there might be motions or a bench trial on the case-in-chief before a District Court Judge. A witness may appear who was not expected. Evidence may be admitted or excluded. The judge may ask a question that brings an issue into focus. A proposal that made sense the previous week may look different after everyone arrives in court.

Our standard preparation also includes confirming court logistics and sending multiple reminders before a scheduled appearance, even though that’s the client’s responsibility. Indeed, in North Carolina, judges expect the accused to keep up with court dates and independently confirm their hearing dates and settings, understanding they’re the ones ultimately responsible for keeping track of everything. A lawyer can research every legal issue, organize the evidence, and plan witness examinations. None of it helps if the client is not standing beside the lawyer when the case is called. That is why our office sends repeated reminders, reminds clients to double-check court dates on the NC Odyssey portal in case something gets moved without notice (that happens all the time BTW), and regularly deals with what can happen after a missed court date.

A Day in the Life of a Criminal Defense Lawyer Begins Before Court

When I sat down with my coffee, I knew two trials in another jurisdiction wouldn’t be called before 2:00 p.m. At least that’s what we had been told. Indeed, at the last trial setting, the judge, the assistant district attorney, and our firm had agreed that the lawyers and witnesses involved in those trials would report for an afternoon trial at 2:00 p.m., with the case being marked with some level of priority. That arrangement is both common and makes sense for the legal profession. In that jurisdiction, mornings tend to focus on administrative matters, guilty pleas, bond hearings, probation violation hearings, continuances and setting dates for trials, first appearances, addressing legal counsel, and other legal issues that may need to be handled before the trial calendar begins.

With some exceptions, North Carolina district court handles misdemeanors and infractions. District Court criminal trials proceed without a jury. De Novo appeals to Superior Court therefore preserve the right to a trial by jury in North Carolina. It’s important to understand how many matters may be scheduled in the same courtroom on the same morning. In a big jurisdiction like Charlotte, it’s fair to say there are a lot. Obviously, some cases take only a few minutes of court time. Others sometimes require testimony, legal arguments, maybe an interpreter, collecting additional paperwork and evidence, require legal filings, or more time for the parties to speak and possibly negotiate a non-trial disposition or plea. A case that appeared likely to resolve may become contested. A matter expected to take an hour may take three.

Still, relative to my morning, we had been told, months and months in advance, “Everyone be here at 2:00 p.m.” That allows the court to use the morning for matters that could be completed before the trials began. It allows the officers to avoid sitting in the courthouse all day. It allows defense lawyers to plan their morning around client calls, file review, paperwork, and other work that doesn’t disappear just because a trial is scheduled later in the day. And despite that clear admonition, that plan went sideways around 7:00 a.m. the day of court.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Criminal Court Sessions Work Differently

The reason a 2:00 p.m. trial arrangement deserves some level of explanation is that a “session of court” doesn’t always work the same way in every county around Charlotte.

Many, if not the majority, of the district criminal courtrooms in the Charlotte metropolitan region operate as one all-day session. Court begins in the morning, the calendar is called (like high school roll call), and the courtroom continues working until the cases that can be addressed that day are finished. A lawyer may know that a trial is unlikely to begin until the afternoon, but the session itself begins in the morning and court never formally stops being in the same session.

Mecklenburg County, which is in North Carolina’s 26th Judicial District, is different. Its size and caseloads require a more divided, if not somewhat more complicated, case calendaring structure. There are administrative criminal courtrooms, including Courtrooms 1130 and 1150, that perform functions different from an ordinary misdemeanor trial courtroom. Courtroom 1130 handles misdemeanor and traffic administration. Courtroom 1150 is used for first appearances and felony administrative matters. Those courtrooms manage large numbers of cases, address custody and scheduling issues, and move files toward the next appropriate stage.

The ordinary district criminal trial courtrooms on the fourth floor include Courtrooms 4150, 4170, and 4310. Other courtrooms exist, and lots of different types of cases, both civil and criminal, are also heard in the building. The official Mecklenburg County Courthouse building guide provides a useful floor-by-floor reference, and we’ve written separately about why Charlotte-Mecklenburg misdemeanor charges may take time to reach trial.

Trial courtrooms in Charlotte generally operate with two sessions each day. The “A” designation identifies the morning session. Courtroom 4150A means the morning session in Courtroom 4150. It generally begins at 9:00 a.m. and runs until about noon. The “B” designation identifies the afternoon session. Courtroom 4150B generally begins at 1:30 p.m. and may continue until about 5:00 p.m. The same A-and-B structure is also used in Courtrooms 4170 and 4310. One judge and one courtroom can address one group of cases in the morning and a different group in the afternoon, and lawyers, officers, witnesses, and clients receive a more defined reporting period than an all-day calendar provides.

That is the general structure, not a guarantee that a particular case will begin at a particular minute. Courtroom assignments, judicial schedules, special proceedings, closures, and local administrative practices can change. The Judicial Branch publishes current Mecklenburg County schedules and calendars, but even a published calendar cannot account for every development inside a courtroom. Things change.  Things change all the time in the Mecklenburg County judicial system.

District criminal courts in Iredell County, in Mooresville and Statesville, as well as in Union, Lincoln, and Gaston counties, commonly use an all-day model. Court begins in the morning and continues through lunch and into the afternoon as needed. Local trial settings and hearings can change, but regionally, Mecklenburg’s two-session trial calendar is something of an outlier.

That difference matters to lawyers who practice in several counties. A Charlotte lawyer may have a 4150B setting that creates a fairly clear afternoon schedule and appearance. The same lawyer may also have a case in an adjoining county where the client and lawyer must appear for the morning calendar call, even when the common practice is that trials are often handled in the afternoon, after lunch. The date may be clearly posted on the court system calendar. How things actually work out can be substantially different in practice.

Clients are not always given the flexibility that may be extended to an officer or lawyer. In an all-day court, a defendant is generally expected to be present for the morning calendar call and remain available until excused. That is not done to make the process difficult. The judge and prosecutor need to know whether the defendant is present and whether the case can proceed before asking officers and civilian witnesses to wait or return for a trial. A missing defendant can change the court’s plan for everyone involved.

As such, someone charged with a criminal offense (the defendant) should never assume that an anticipated afternoon trial excuses a morning appearance. Unless the court (the Judge) gives different instructions, the listed reporting time controls. What looks like an unnecessary morning in court may be the court’s way of determining which cases are truly ready to be heard.

Superior Court adds another layer of complexity. North Carolina Superior Court handles felony criminal cases and misdemeanor de novo appeals from District Court. A criminal session may begin in the morning and continue throughout the week. That does not mean every case begins when the weekly session opens. Cases still must be ordered, witnesses coordinated, pleas addressed, and trials placed where they fit. In Mecklenburg County, a matter may also receive an assigned plea or arraignment time in Administrative Court, which is often in Courtroom 5310 on the 5th Floor fo the Mecklenburg County Courthouse. Lincoln County also uses assigned Superior Court slots for some matters.

All of that also involves the ordinary uncertainty of testimony, negotiations, witness availability, and the time another case may require. “Court at 9:00” can describe an all-day district session, a Mecklenburg A session, the opening of a week-long Superior Court term, or a specific procedural setting. The concept may seem simple enough. The scheduling system behind it is, by no means, simple.

Against that background, the prior 2:00 p.m. trial setting made sense in a one-session jurisdiction. The court could use the morning for administrative matters, pleas, and bond hearings, then bring in the trial participants for the afternoon. Everyone had a reason to rely on that plan.

Out of an abundance of caution, early that morning I sent the prosecutor a brief message to check in and confirm whether the officer would be available for trial.

The response changed the day. The court had decided to operate two district court sessions, and our case might be called that morning despite the 2:00 p.m. setting we had previously set.

There went my morning.

There is a meaningful difference between planning to try a case at some point and learning that the case may be called within hours. Trial preparation is never finished in the absolute sense. Once a case may be reached, the lawyer must stop working from a general plan and prepare to make immediate decisions in a courtroom.

So I poured my coffee, made sure to add more, put it in a travel mug, threw on a suit, gathered my files and what I needed, and headed to court.

North Carolina Criminal Court Schedules Can Change Throughout the Day

I arrived early. I prefer to be there, in court, just in case something changes. Once I arrived, the anticipated starting time began moving in half-hour increments. Which, to be fair, I knew in my heart would happen. Defense lawyers’ calendars and plans are not high on the priority list in criminal court in North Carolina. First, we were told we’d start at 11:00 a.m. Then 11:30. Then noon. Then 12:30. The court broke for lunch and told us to come back at 2:00 p.m. During lunch, word came that the trial would not begin until 2:30.

At about 3:00 p.m., the trial finally began. It continued until at least 4:30. That’s not just normal.  It’s what we anticipated. It’s what we advised clients to expect.  

Every new start time was close enough that we had to stay ready and close by. In those types of situations, there is no meaningful opportunity to leave, settle into another complicated file, or begin work that requires uninterrupted attention. The client lives with the same uncertainty. Hurry up and wait in court. Wait some more. Receive another time. Wait again. Then be prepared to try the case without hesitation when the judge is ready.

The repeated delays do not mean that anyone is trying to be difficult.  A courtroom has more moving parts than the people waiting in the gallery can see. A defendant may be in custody and need to be transported. A witness may be delayed. Another case may require an unexpected hearing. A plea may take longer because the judge must address an issue before accepting it. Lawyers may be working through a final dispute that could resolve a case without trial. The court also has obligations to everyone else whose name appears on the calendar.

That does not make the waiting convenient. It does help explain why a time printed on a calendar cannot always function like a medical appointment or a business meeting.

We have written before about how court is scheduled in North Carolina. Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-61, the district attorney prepares the criminal trial dockets. The judge controls the proceedings in the courtroom. Those responsibilities operate within a system in which cases resolve, expand, or encounter problems throughout the day.

The North Carolina Judicial Branch court-date search can confirm the listed date, time, and location of a court appearance. It cannot promise when a particular case will actually be heard. The distinction can be frustrating, but it is real.

What a Criminal Defense Lawyer Does While Waiting for Trial

Waiting in court is not downtime. A lawyer never gets to completely relax. Defense attorneys generally can’t start another task that would make it hard to shift back into trial mode. The file stays open. The evidence remains close. The order of witnesses, the disputed facts, and the legal issues keep running in the lawyer’s mind.

What a Client May See What the Defense Lawyer Is Actually Doing
Sitting in the courtroom Taking the temperature of the Court. Monitoring the order of cases and the Court’s rulings, listening for the case to be called, tracking witness availability, and reviewing the trial plan.
Another delayed starting time Updating the client and the office, preserving readiness, and deciding what other work can be addressed during the delay.
A brief recess Responding to limited office matters without losing concentration on the testimony, evidence, and legal questions ahead.
The case is finally called Moving immediately from waiting into witness examination, evidentiary objections, legal argument, and decisions that may affect the outcome.

Trial readiness is partly intellectual and partly mental discipline. The lawyer does their best to remain engaged without ignoring other important matters. That is harder than it sounds. Repeated interruptions leave mental residue. Each call, email, and unrelated problem occupies part of the attention that must later return to the case being tried.

Once the case begins, the waiting ceases to matter. A district court trial is not a rehearsal merely because there is no jury. The State presents evidence. Witnesses testify. The defense may cross-examine them, object to evidence, make motions, offer evidence, and argue whether the State has proven every element beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge serves as the finder of fact and decides the verdict.

There is no extra credit for having waited patiently since morning. When the case is called, the defense lawyer is ready.

What to Expect on a North Carolina Criminal Court Date

A scheduled court time ordinarily tells the parties when they must be available. It does not necessarily establish when testimony will begin or when the case will conclude. For someone who rarely enters a courthouse, that difference may prove to be more than a bit annoying. In ordinary life, a 10:00 appointment generally means something will happen reasonably close to 10:00. Criminal court does not always operate that way. In fact, sometimes it seems, more often than not, plans and schedules are more of a suggestion than set time.  Of course, that’s true unless the defendant is late or misses the appearance entirely. While there is a certain amount of latitude necessary in our system of justice, that is not necessarily afforded to a defendant facing criminal charges.  Bad things can happen if you’re late. Orders for Arrest may be issued. Bonds may be forfeited.  That’s one reason, of many, we tell clients to be in the courthouse at least one hour before the setting is scheduled to begin. If you court opens at 9:00 a.m., be there at 8:00 a.m. Plan for bad traffic, wrecks, parking issues, time getting through security at the courthouse, finding a seat, using the bathroom, etc.  Put simply, DO NOT BE LATE.

A court date may require planning for most or all of the day. Work, parking, transportation, medication, meals, and family responsibilities should be arranged before arriving. It’s better not to park roadside and instead find a parking deck that doesn’t have a time limit. Courthouse rules differ, including rules governing phones and electronic devices. The safest source for current logistical information is the county’s official Judicial Branch information.

Arriving early does not guarantee an early departure. Arriving late can create a far more serious problem. A case may be called once, passed briefly, or addressed while other matters are moving. Leaving the courthouse without communicating with counsel can create confusion at the precise moment the case is reached. That is why the reminders described earlier are not busywork. They protect the client from an avoidable failure to appear and keep the legal team informed. The court system has little ability to account for the text someone overlooked, the calendar entry made incorrectly, or the assumption that an afternoon setting eliminates any reason to be available earlier. Cases are regularly “held over” from a morning session until an afternoon session of court.

That uncertainty clearly affects clients emotionally. Waiting for a criminal case to be called is not the same as waiting for an ordinary appointment. It’s normal to be thinking about a driver’s license, employment, family, reputation, or the possibility of jail. Every delay extends the period before you know what will happen next.

Criminal Defense Work Continues While the Lawyer Is in Court

The rest of a defense attorney’s practice does not stop because one lawyer is sitting in a courtroom. Staff members continue answering calls, monitoring deadlines, collecting documents, communicating scheduling information, and moving other files forward. Other clients still have questions. New evidence may arrive. Another court may need paperwork. A family may call about someone who has just been arrested and wants to see if they can get a bond hearing.

This is one reason a team matters.  At Powers Law Firm, from the outset we advise clients of our collaborative, team approach. A criminal defense practice cannot function as though every task begins and ends with the lawyer standing in court. Legal assistants and other lawyers at the firm help maintain communication and continuity when a trial consumes the day and takes a single lawyer out of that mix. We recognize which cases require immediate attention and which can wait until the lawyer is no longer preparing to question a witness.

The challenge is deciding what can be addressed without compromising readiness for the case at hand. A short logistical answer may be manageable. A complicated legal analysis likely is not. Beginning a detailed review of another file ten minutes before trial does not serve either client well.

That is not a complaint. It is a description of the work.

I am more patient about these things than I was as a young lawyer. At least I try to be. Experience does not make the day less chaotic. It helps me recognize that the chaos is rarely about me.

Why Criminal Defense Practice Requires Patience With People

The easiest mistake would be to make every inconvenience personal. Most of the time, it is not.

For the lawyer, a court date may be one entry on a crowded calendar. For the client, it may be the largest event of the year, if not their life, for certain serious felony charges. Stress affects how people listen, remember, communicate, and react. Court instructions that seem routine to those who work in the system can be difficult to absorb when so much appears to be at stake. Repetition, calm explanation, and patience are part of the representation.

More than 34 years ago, on my first day practicing law, I was given three pieces of advice that have stayed with me. First, defense lawyers should understand, early on, that there is a reason people are in the court system. Second, that reason may involve poor judgment, immaturity, substance abuse, untreated mental illness, fear, anger, self-centered behavior, bad luck, or one bad decision. Third, whatever brought them there, they come to a lawyer when they need help.

More than 34 years of criminal courtroom work have reinforced that advice. During that time, I have tried cases across North Carolina, served as president of the North Carolina Advocates for Justice, taught and hosted continuing legal education programs, and worked with lawyers, judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers on criminal justice issues. None of that makes a court calendar predictable. It does help me remain ready and keep the day’s frustrations in perspective.

Patience does not mean passivity. It does not require a lawyer or staff member to accept abusive treatment. It means separating urgency from noise, identifying the legal problem beneath the emotion, and refusing to let irritation interfere with professional judgment.

Sometimes that begins with taking a breath and explaining the same point again. Sometimes it means listening past the emotion to find the real concern. Sometimes it requires setting a reasonable boundary and then returning attention to the work that brought the client to the office in the first place.

The criminal court system deals with human behavior at its least orderly. Expecting every participant to communicate perfectly, arrive emotionally composed, and respond rationally to uncertainty is, quite simply, unrealistic. The lawyer’s role includes bringing order to that disorder without becoming part of it.

Courtroom Experience Means Preparing for Uncertainty

Courtroom experience is not limited to knowing how to question a witness or make an objection. Frankly, knowing the law is the easy part. More than thirty years of duking it out in court has helped develop my patience level when the schedule changes, the evidence changes, and the expected issue turns out to be entirely irrelevant.

A lawyer who prepares for only one outcome may be left without a workable plan when circumstances change. A lawyer who understands the file, the governing law, and the available options can more easily adapt without abandoning the defense. Flexibility is not improvisation without preparation. It is what preparation makes possible.

Experience also teaches respect for the people who keep the system running. Courtroom clerks, bailiffs, judges, prosecutors, interpreters, law enforcement officers, other defense lawyers, and courthouse staff are all managing competing obligations. Courtesy does not require agreement. It does make it easier to obtain reliable information, address problems, and move a case forward when the schedule changes.

After decades in court, I still cannot tell a client exactly when a case will be called merely because a time appears on the calendar. I can explain the process, prepare the case, and remain ready when the court reaches it. That is less satisfying than a guaranteed schedule, but it is honest.

Frequently Asked Questions About North Carolina Criminal Court Dates

Why does my North Carolina court date say 9:00 a.m. if my case will not be heard until the afternoon?

A North Carolina criminal court date lists the time the session opens and the time the court expects the parties to be available, not the time a particular case will be reached. In an all-day district court session, the judge and prosecutor use the morning calendar call to confirm who is present and which cases are ready before deciding how the day and trial schedule will develop. 

What is the difference between Courtroom 4150A and 4150B in Charlotte?

Courtroom 4150A refers to the morning session in Courtroom 4150 at the Mecklenburg County Courthouse, which generally runs from 9:00 a.m. until about noon. Courtroom 4150B refers to the afternoon session in the same courtroom, which generally begins at 1:30 p.m. The same A-and-B structure may apply to Courtrooms 4170 and 4310. A defendant with a pending criminal case should confirm the correct courtroom and session before the appearance.

What happens if I leave court before my case is called in North Carolina?

Leaving court before the case is called can result in the case being called in the defendant’s absence, which may lead to a failure to appear, an order for arrest, and additional consequences depending on the charge. A defendant who must step out of the courtroom for any reason should ask counsel first and make certain they’re immediately available. Our office maintains a separate explanation of what may happen after a missed court date in North Carolina.

How long should I plan to be at court for a misdemeanor case in Charlotte or a surrounding county?

Planning for a misdemeanor court date in the Charlotte area generally means reserving the full session, and in an all-day county courtroom that may mean the entire day. Arrange work schedules, transportation, child care, and medication with that possibility in mind.

The Practice of Criminal Law Can Be Slow and Suddenly Fast

Real law is messy. At times it can be both complicated and convoluted. It also can be painfully slow and startlingly fast. The legal problem rarely arrives on its own.

By breakfast, the Tuesday I had planned no longer existed. By late morning, each anticipated starting time had moved another half hour. By the afternoon, all that waiting gave way to trial. Meanwhile, the rest of the practice kept moving, whether I was sitting in a courtroom or not.

None of that made the day extraordinary. It made it Tuesday.

The day began with coffee, legal research, and file review at 5:00 a.m. It continued through a changing court schedule, hours of waiting, and a trial that did not begin until roughly 3:00 p.m. Somewhere between those points, I remembered the advice I received when I started practicing.

The client is not coming to court because this is an ordinary day. The client is there because, for that client, it may be anything but ordinary.

And that’s part of the job and a day in the life of a criminal defense lawyer in North Carolina.

Charlotte Criminal Defense Lawyer Ready When the Case Is Called

Powers Law Firm helps clients facing select criminal charges in Charlotte and throughout Mecklenburg, Union, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, and Rowan counties. The firm also travels for certain matters across North Carolina on a case-by-case basis. If you need help understanding a charge, a court date, or what may happen next, Powers Law Firm may be available to help. Call 704-342-4357 or contact the firm to arrange a confidential consultation.

by

North Carolina’s current bar examination does not specifically test North Carolina law. Lawyers admitted before 2019, and perhaps some clients too, could be forgiven for responding with a bit of surprise. Wait, what?

Graduates of North Carolina law schools may very well have studied and been tested on North Carolina law, and every lawyer should be competent in the law governing a matter they undertake for representation.

Yet, without wishing to seem unkind, it bears pointing out that the present testing and licensure process does not establish a demonstrated knowledge base in North Carolina law. A lawyer educated outside North Carolina can pass the bar exam without ever being required to study or be tested on North Carolina statutes, appellate decisions, evidence, procedure, or other state-specific law.

Continue reading

by

Misdemeanor death by vehicle evidence in North Carolina must connect the alleged traffic violation to the death. That’s what is meant by “proximate cause.” The State must establish that a qualifying violation of vehicle or traffic law was a proximate cause of the death. A fatal collision, a traffic citation, and an officer’s description of fault (legal responsibility) each deserve some level of consideration, but the prosecution ultimately carries the burden of proof.

The State (the assistant district attorney) must prove the criminal charge beyond a reasonable doubt. To be clear, even if the fatality is the result of a minor traffic violation or something that might normally only result in a ticket for a traffic “infraction,” misdemeanor death by vehicle charges can follow when that violation proximately causes a death.

Misdemeanor Death by Vehicle Evidence at a Glance

Evidence What it can show and what to check
Collision report Identifies alleged violations, witnesses, and the officer’s account. The underlying evidence must support the conclusion about fault and causation.
Scene photographs and measurements Document roadway conditions, vehicle positions, damage, and sight lines. Review when they were taken and what may have changed.
Witness accounts Describe what witnesses saw or heard. Viewing position, timing, consistency, and firsthand knowledge affect their usefulness.
Surveillance and dash-camera recordings Can show vehicle movement and the sequence of events. Check the full recording, camera angle, timestamps, and any missing footage.
Vehicle data downloads – (EDR) Electronic Data Recorder (sometimes referred to as Black Box) May contain speed, braking, airbag deployment, and other impact data. Review what the particular system recorded and when each reading occurred.
Vehicle inspections and maintenance records May identify equipment problems. Determine whether a defect existed before impact and whether it contributed to the death.
Medical and toxicology evidence May help explain injury, cause of death, or impairment allegations. Interpret the findings in context and connect them to the disputed issues.

In North Carolina, Misdemeanor Death is a serious criminal charge. In fact, it’s a Class A1 misdemeanor, the highest misdemeanor classification in North Carolina. It carries a possible maximum jail sentence of up to 150 days, depending on your prior conviction level and the facts of the case. A conviction also carries a driver’s license revocation, ordinarily for one year, with no statutory authority for a limited driving privilege during that revocation.

If you’ve been charged with “Misdemeanor Death,” the investigation may include photographs, measurements, witness interviews, vehicle downloads, surveillance recordings, and medical findings. Those sources can answer different questions. They can also disagree.

We believe an effective defense strategy begins by identifying what each source actually establishes, what depends on an assumption, and what remains unknown. We also think it helps to have a lawyer standing by your side who has substantial experience handling these types of charges. At Powers Law Firm, while based in the Charlotte metro region, we provide consultations statewide and travel throughout North Carolina for select matters. To that end, we offer a free, confidential consultation.

Misdemeanor Death by Vehicle Evidence | Alleged Traffic Violation

Under N.C.G.S. § 20-141.4(a2), the State must prove an unintentional death, a qualifying vehicle or traffic-law violation other than impaired driving under N.C.G.S. § 20-138.1, and proximate causation. The word “unintentional” describes the death. It does not require the underlying traffic violation itself to have been accidental.

Defense lawyers ordinarily start by identifying the particular violation the State alleges and thereafter determine how that abridgment of the law was a proximate cause of the resulting fatality. That can be more complicated, and to some extent nuanced, than one might expect. Rarely is an accident caused by a single factor.  In many instances, accidents are caused by a series of events. As such, a speeding case presents different factual questions from a failure-to-yield case. An equipment allegation may require examining the vehicle and its maintenance history to determine how that may have resulted in a wreck that killed someone. A distracted driving allegation may depend on the timing and nature of the activity attributed to the driver who wasn’t paying attention.

The analysis then follows the evidence from that alleged violation to the fatal injury. The State doesn’t complete that analysis merely by placing the violation and the death in the same narrative. There must be a causal connection.

Our misdemeanor death by vehicle legal guide addresses the broader law of causation. Here, the focus is on how the evidence supports or challenges the prosecution’s account.

North Carolina Crash Reports and Reconstruction Evidence

A collision report provides a starting point. It may identify drivers, witnesses, vehicle positions, apparent contributing circumstances, and on-scene statements. A forensic reconstruction may go further by analyzing measurements, physical damage, electronic data, and the sequence of events.

The source and reliability of each statement can matter. An officer may have personally observed a damaged sign but learned the vehicle’s earlier location from a witness who didn’t get a good look at things. A diagram on an accident report may reflect measured coordinates, a witness account, or an illustrative sketch. Those differences can affect how the information may be evaluated. Obviously, there is a human factor involved. We all carry biases. We all can have better or worse days. We all can be tired or frustrated or flat-out make a mistake at times. That’s one reason it makes sense to dig into the details and consider them in the decision-making process as part of the defense.

If the report assigns a contributing circumstance to your vehicle, your lawyer may want to consider the source, factor in whether the information is reliable, and further analyze, in the totality of the circumstances, its relevance to the specifics of your unique factual basis. Was it supported by a measurement, a recording, an admission, or an inference? Does later evidence support the same explanation?

A productive review tests the account against the underlying materials. It does not depend on assuming that every officer’s conclusion is wrong or that every entry is complete. Criminal defense, particularly in the complicated fact patterns common in Misdemeanor Death by Vehicle charges, tends to be a holistic process in which we analyze a host of different “facts.”

Event Data Recorders in Fatal-Crash Cases

A motor vehicle event data recorder (MVEDR or “EDR”), sometimes called a vehicle’s black box, can preserve technical information associated with a collision. Depending on the vehicle and system, available information may include indicated speed, brake status, accelerator input, and changes in velocity. Federal requirements identify different data elements and recording conditions. They do not make every vehicle’s available record identical. 49 C.F.R. § 563.7

Your defense may involve retrieval materials and the documentation needed to interpret them. That may not always be the case, as a fair number of older model vehicles on our roadways are simply not equipped with an EDR.  In contrast, some newer vehicles (and some semi-trucks) actually record, on video, the accident itself and may even call 911 immediately after impact to alert law enforcement of the wreck.

A selected screenshot can omit key information about the event as a whole, the recording interval, what led up to the accident in the minutes before the collision, or the limits of the nature and extent of the datum recorded.

For example, a recorded speed requires attention to its timing. A reading before impact does not, by itself, establish the speed at impact. A recorded change in velocity describes a different measurement from the vehicle’s pre-impact travel speed. A brake-status entry likely needs to be interpreted according to what that system records.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration distinguishes crash-event data from audio or video recordings and truck hours-of-service logs. Those records may complement one another, but they do not describe the same information. NHTSA event data recorder information

The useful question is what the particular record establishes when compared with the rest of the evidence.

Surveillance Recordings and the Fatal-Crash Timeline

A nearby business camera or dash camera may also show vehicle movement that witnesses could not describe. The recording may also begin too late, omit part of the roadway, or display a clock that does not match another device.

A reconstruction using video necessarily takes into account the camera’s view angle, timing, and the distance measurements used in any speed calculation. A copy shared through a messaging application may lack information available in the original export.

The timeline might be helpful if it distinguishes the collision from surrounding events. The time displayed on a camera, the first emergency call, and the dispatch record all may describe different moments or events. Their relationship therefore deserves some level of examination before someone treats them as interchangeable timestamps.

As such, when possible, preserving the original recordings gives the defense a better basis for evaluating those questions than relying solely on a short clip someone else selected.

Sight Distance, Braking, and Opportunities to Avoid a Collision

In a failure-to-yield or pedestrian case, the dispute may involve when the danger became visible and what opportunity the driver had to respond. That inquiry can require evidence of lighting, road grade, obstructions, vehicle positions, and movement before impact.

A photograph taken later may help document the location while leaving other conditions unresolved. Daylight photographs do not establish nighttime visibility. A cleared roadside does not show where vegetation stood on the crash date.

If a reconstruction assigns a perception-and-response interval, the factual basis for that interval should be explained. The same applies to assumptions about braking performance, road friction, or when another vehicle entered the driver’s path.

The purpose is to determine which conclusions survive a careful examination of their inputs. An apparently precise calculation can depend on measurements or assumptions that remain disputed.

Mechanical Evidence and Vehicle Inspections

An allegation involving tires, brakes, steering, or other equipment requires attention to the condition before the collision. Damage discovered afterward does not automatically establish when it occurred.

Inspection photographs, maintenance records, repair history, and the physical components may help distinguish a preexisting defect from collision damage. The investigation must also identify the legal duty attributed to the accused driver and whether the alleged violation contributed to the death.

A vehicle inspection can support the State’s theory, reveal a different explanation, or leave a question unresolved. Its value depends on what the inspection documents and whether its conclusions fit the physical evidence.

Other Drivers, Pedestrians, and Medical Evidence

Evidence about another road user’s conduct can bear on causation. It does not automatically eliminate the accused driver’s responsibility. More than one cause may contribute to a fatal event, and the analysis must address the defendant’s alleged violation rather than simply identify someone else who made a mistake.

Medical records and findings may help explain the connection between the collision, the injuries, and the death. Where toxicology from the deceased is relevant, it requires its own scientific analysis. A postmortem alcohol result should not become a shortcut to a conclusion about conduct before the collision. Our discussion of postmortem blood alcohol concentration explains some of those issues.

Reconstruction Opinions Under North Carolina Rule 702

When the State (or the defense) offers a reconstruction opinion based on scientific or technical knowledge, North Carolina Rule 702 governs the required foundation. The rule addresses the witness’s qualifications, sufficient supporting facts or data, reliable methods, and reliable application to the case.

An analysis therefore deserves more than reviewing the final conclusion. Your lawyer may want to review the measurements, calculations, photographs, software inputs, and other materials used to reach it.

Different disputes require different responses. An unsupported methodology may present an admissibility issue. A disagreement about a measurement or inference may instead concern the weight the factfinder should give the opinion. Neither every disagreement nor every missing item requires exclusion.

Preparing a Misdemeanor Death by Vehicle Defense

Preservation can begin before all charging decisions are complete. Law enforcement, a towing facility, an insurer, a business, or a vehicle owner may have collected relevant materials as evidence.

Powers Law Firm uses a collaborative approach to case review and defense preparation. For a fatal-crash allegation, that work includes examining the State’s theory alongside the evidence that supports or challenges it. Our misdemeanor death by vehicle defense page explains the broader charge and representation process.

If you face misdemeanor death by vehicle charges in North Carolina, Powers Law Firm may be available to help. Call 704-342-4357 to schedule a confidential consultation.

by

Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department (CMPD) lab analyst Kelly Elizabeth Shea faces a misdemeanor obstruction of justice charge related to a March 4, 2024 laboratory analysis. According to September 21, 2026 reporting by WSOC-TV investigators allege an intentional control-sample switch and a misleading report.

Citing a letter from Crime Lab Director Matthew Mathis, the Charlotte Observer in March 2025 described a problematic failed positive control followed by the alleged substitution of material known to produce the expected positive result. A positive control uses known DNA to help establish whether the testing process worked properly. That is the function described in the FBI’s forensic DNA standards.

If the allegation is true, someone apparently encountered a failed check and took action to purposely (and criminally) replace it with a successful one. Why the analyst allegedly chose to do that remains unknown.

Continue reading

by

A public speakerphone conversation is clearly annoying. Indeed, most folks realize how rude and self-centered it is to stand in line at the DMV, mash the speaker button, and conduct a full-throated conversation about some truly annoying/useless topic, while forty strangers stare at the ceiling and bite their tongues. But is that necessarily illegal in North Carolina?

No statute covers it. No ordinance reaches it. No officer is coming. The conversation continues, the volume rises, and the rest of the room learns things about Greg that Greg’s own mother does not need or want to know.

North Carolina has managed to regulate a remarkable amount of human behavior. There are statutes governing where a person may fish, how a person may transport a load in an open truck bed, and what a person may do with a shopping cart that does not belong to them. Somewhere in that same code there is room for a modest proposal. One might reasonably suggest that before a retailer hands over a device capable of broadcasting a private conversation into a public space, the purchaser should be required to complete training and pass a short practical examination on how to use a cell around other people.

Conduct What North Carolina Law Means
Talking on speakerphone in a public place Being loud, inconsiderate, or annoying does not by itself create a criminal offense. North Carolina has no general law prohibiting public speakerphone conversations.
Continuing after a business asks you to leave A private business can control conduct on its premises. If management directs someone to leave and that person remains, the issue may become second-degree trespass under N.C.G.S. § 14-159.13.
Disrupting court with a cell phone Willful conduct that interrupts court proceedings can implicate North Carolina’s criminal contempt statutes. Local courthouse and courtroom rules may impose additional restrictions on electronic devices.
Using a phone while driving North Carolina prohibits particular forms of phone use while driving, including texting and reading electronic messages. As of August 24, 2026, the State has not enacted a general hands-free prohibition for adult drivers.

What North Carolina Law Actually Says About Cell Phone Use While Driving

Satire aside, there are laws in North Carolina regarding the use of cell phones while driving.  In those instances, a speaker phone conversation is, frankly, likely more safe that holding the receiver to your ear. Clearly, texting, checking emails, or checking out socials are both dangerous and illegal.

N.C.G.S. § 20-137.4A – Unlawful use of mobile telephone for text messaging or email prohibits texting while driving. A violation is an infraction carrying a fine of one hundred dollars plus court costs, unless you’re driving a school bus at the time, which is deemed a Class 2 misdemeanor. Contrary to common sense, the Chapter 20 motor vehicle law does not allow for driver’s license points, and it does not add insurance points. Furthermore, and again contrary to common sense and the obvious dangers of texting while driving, failure to comply with the law “shall not” (words of mandamus) constitute either negligence per se or contributory negligence per se. Go figure.

Drivers under the age of eighteen face a broader restriction under N.C.G.S. § 20-137.3, which limits mobile telephone use behind the wheel with narrow exceptions and carries a $25 fine.

What North Carolina does not have, despite years of proposed legislation, is a comprehensive hands-free law.

Bills carrying the Hands Free NC name have been filed and refiled in Raleigh, and would prohibit holding a device, supporting it with the body, watching video, and similar conduct behind the wheel, with escalating fines and insurance points for repeat violations. Those bills have not become law. A number of states have already moved to full handheld bans. North Carolina remains among the states that prohibit texting while permitting a handheld call, with very little real consequences or truly meaningful penalty.

Why Rudeness Is Not a Crime in North Carolina

The deeper reason no speakerphone statute exists is that the criminal law does not punish annoyance, and a great deal of obnoxious speech is protected speech under the First Amendment.

North Carolina’s N.C.G.S. § 14-288.4, Disorderly Conduct statute applies to behaviors that are genuinely disruptive, including fighting known as an “affray,” violent behavior involving assault and battery, and language or gestures intended and likely to provoke immediate violent retaliation.

It does not reach a loud phone call while standing in line at the DMV.

Prosecutors understand the difference, and so do judges. A statute broad enough to capture rudeness would sweep in political argument, religious speech, street preaching, and the ordinary noise of people living near one another. Drafting a law that punishes only the conduct everyone agrees is intolerable turns out to be almost impossible, which is why the remedy for a loud caller remains what it has always been. A polite request, a change of seat, or the quiet judgment of everyone in the room.

That gap between what feels wrong and what is actually unlawful runs throughout criminal law. People charged with a crime routinely arrive at a courthouse believing that conduct which offended someone must therefore be criminal, and people who report conduct routinely learn the opposite. The essential “prima facie” elements of an attempt crime or other offense often matter. What the State can prove also matters. The distance between bad manners and a criminal charge is the subject at hand.

Frequently Asked Questions | North Carolina Cell Phone & Public Disturbance Laws

Is it legal to talk on a cell phone while driving in North Carolina?

Talking on a handheld cell phone while driving remains lawful in North Carolina for adult drivers, which surprises a great many people who assume this state adopted a hands free law years ago. Texting while driving is prohibited under N.C.G.S. § 20-137.4A, and drivers under eighteen face broader limits under N.C.G.S. § 20-137.3, but no general statute prohibits an adult from holding a phone and carrying on a call. A driver whose phone use contributes to a collision can still face a charge under other statutes, including careless and reckless driving, because the absence of a hands free law does not excuse driving without due care.

What is the penalty for texting while driving in North Carolina?

The penalty for texting while driving in North Carolina is an infraction carrying a one hundred dollar fine plus court costs under N.C.G.S. § 20-137.4A. For most drivers the violation does not add driver’s license points and does not add insurance points, which is why the offense receives less attention than its safety consequences warrant. School bus operators are treated differently and face a criminal charge rather than an infraction. A driver who receives a citation should read it carefully, because a distracted driving stop sometimes produces additional charges arising from the same encounter.

Can you be charged with disorderly conduct for being loud or rude in public in North Carolina?

Disorderly conduct in North Carolina requires more than volume or being rude. N.C.G.S. § 14-288.4 defines the offense as a public disturbance intentionally caused through specified conduct, including fighting, violent behavior, and language or gestures likely to provoke immediate retaliation, along with particular conduct at schools, funerals, and public buildings. The offense is generally a Class 2 misdemeanor. A loud phone conversation in a waiting room, standing alone, does not satisfy the elements, and a charge built on nothing more than irritation invites a motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence.

Can a business ask someone to leave over a loud phone call?

A private business may ask a person to leave for almost any lawful reason, including a phone call that disrupts other customers, and the request carries legal weight. Under N.C.G.S. § 14-159.13, a person who remains on premises after being notified to leave by someone in charge can be charged with second degree trespass, a Class 3 misdemeanor. The charge does not turn on whether the underlying behavior was criminal. It turns on the notice to leave and the refusal to go, which is a distinction people learn about after the fact more than before it.

What happens if a cell phone goes off in a North Carolina courtroom?

A cell phone that records, or otherwise disrupts a session of court in North Carolina can be treated as direct criminal contempt under N.C.G.S. § 5A-11, which reaches willful behavior committed during a sitting of the court that interrupts its proceedings. A judge may act summarily under N.C.G.S. § 5A-14, and the punishment available under N.C.G.S. § 5A-12 includes censure, a fine, and imprisonment up to thirty days. Local rules and the presiding judge control what devices may be brought into a courtroom at all, and those rules tend to vary from county to county. Silencing the phone before passing through security is the smart thing to do.

Disorderly Conduct & Trespassing Charges in Mecklenburg County

Cases like these start small. A manager asks someone to leave. The conversation continues in the parking lot. An officer arrives to two versions of the same ninety seconds and writes down one of them. By the time the case reaches district court, the citation reads like a settled account of what happened, and the defendant is left facing criminal charges and explaining to their lawyer that the account is wrong.

District courts move quickly, and a defendant who has never been charged with anything sometimes assumes the outcome depends on prior character or on a lack of a record. While charges may sometimes seem silly or inconsequential, being charged (and possibly even arrested) with a criminal offense even for something as simple as trespassing or disorderly conduct deserves the attention of an experienced lawyer.

Bill Powers has tried criminal cases in North Carolina courtrooms for more than three decades and has spent years teaching other lawyers continuing legal education on evidence and trial practice. He served as President of the North Carolina Advocates for Justice and received the North Carolina State Bar Distinguished Service Award.

Powers Law Firm handles criminal defense and impaired driving matters in the Charlotte metro area and may be available to help with charges pending in Mecklenburg County and the surrounding district courts. Call now to schedule a confidential consultation: 704-342-4357

by

Warrantless DNA testing in North Carolina does not necessarily require police to obtain a new search warrant when the biological evidence was lawfully collected during an earlier investigation. In an August 5, 2026 opinion, State v. Howze, the North Carolina Court of Appeals approved DNA testing of a bloodstained shirt collected in 2016 and later used to connect the defendant to a 2019 murder, challenging the legality of the original seizure and resulting in a Fourth Amendment search and seizure analysis.

DNA Evidence Issue What It Means in a North Carolina Criminal Case
How police obtained the DNA The analysis usually begins with how law enforcement came into possession of the biological material. A lawful warrant, consent, abandonment, plain view, statutory collection procedure, or another recognized legal basis may permit police to obtain evidence containing DNA.
DNA taken directly from your body A blood draw or cheek swab implicates constitutional protections because police are obtaining biological material directly from you. The legal authority for that collection should be examined separately from any later laboratory testing.
DNA on discarded property A cup, cigarette, bottle, straw, napkin, or similar item may contain DNA after it is discarded. Whether police may collect and test the item can depend on abandonment, where the property was left, and whether officers entered a constitutionally protected area to retrieve it.
DNA on lawfully seized property Clothing, weapons, vehicles, phones, and other physical evidence may contain blood, saliva, skin cells, hair, or other biological material. If police lawfully possess the item, later forensic testing may present a different constitutional question from the original seizure.
Testing evidence already in police possession Police may not necessarily need a new warrant merely because investigators later decide to conduct DNA testing on evidence they already lawfully possess. How the evidence originally came into government custody can therefore become key in a suppression analysis.
DNA from an older or unrelated investigation Biological evidence collected during one investigation may later become relevant to another investigation. The passage of time or the fact that the investigations are unrelated does not, by itself, determine whether later testing is lawful.
How long can police keep biological evidence? Evidence retention is a separate question from whether police can lawfully collect or test the evidence. The status of the investigation, preservation requirements, applicable statutes, and agency procedures may affect whether evidence must be retained, returned, destroyed, or removed from a database.
Challenging the original collection A defense lawyer may examine whether police had a lawful basis to obtain the item or sample, whether officers were lawfully present, whether they had lawful access, and whether the facts existing at the time justified the seizure.
Challenging the DNA testing Even when police lawfully obtained the evidence, DNA results might be challenged on the grounds of contamination, chain of custody, laboratory procedures, mixed samples, interpretation, statistical analysis, transfer, and other forensic issues.
What a DNA result actually proves A DNA “match” can help identify the source of biological material, but it does not necessarily establish when the material was deposited, how it arrived at a location, what activity produced it, or whether the person committed the charged offense.

State v. Howze is interesting in that the DNA evidence involved did not begin with a cheek swab, a discarded cup, an arrest-related DNA collection, or a search warrant directed toward the homicide being prosecuted.

It began with a bloody shirt.

In December 2016, J’Marius Howze went to a hospital after suffering a gunshot wound. A High Point police officer responded to investigate the shooting. The officer saw blood on Howze’s clothing and directed a crime-scene technician to collect the clothing as evidence. The investigation was never solved, and the shirt remained sealed in police evidence storage.

Several years later, High Point police were investigating the May 2019 shooting death of Cameron Owens. Investigators recovered a HiPoint nine-millimeter carbine rifle near the murder scene. Detective Buben located the shirt from Howze’s earlier shooting and submitted both the old clothing and swabs from the firearm to the State Crime Lab for DNA analysis. According to the opinion, the testing found Howze’s DNA on almost every sample submitted from the gun. That evidence became part of the probable-cause showing used to obtain a warrant for his arrest for first-degree murder.

Howze later moved to suppress the DNA evidence. His argument presented two distinct constitutional questions.

First, could police lawfully seize his clothing at the hospital in 2016?

Second, even if the shirt had been lawfully seized, could police years later analyze the biological material on it and use that DNA in an unrelated homicide investigation without obtaining another warrant?

The Court of Appeals answered both questions in favor of the State.

That second issue is what makes Howze somewhat interesting, at least from a factual basis.

Lawful Seizure of Evidence

Howze does not begin with the proposition that police can test whatever DNA happens to come into their possession. The Court must first determine whether law enforcement has lawfully obtained evidence from the outset.

In so doing, the State may rely on the longstanding plain-view doctrine.

A warrantless seizure may be permissible when an officer is lawfully situated to observe the evidence, the item’s evidentiary or incriminating character is immediately apparent, and the officer has lawful access to the object. North Carolina cases also recognize an inadvertence component to the plain-view analysis.

The phrase “immediately apparent” can, to some extent, be misleading. Police do not have to know with certainty precisely what later testing might reveal. Our appellate courts generally treat such issues as questions of probable cause.

It requires probable cause to believe that the item is evidence of criminal activity. That determination must be tied to the circumstances known at the time the item is seized, not to evidence discovered through later testing.

Officers responded to the hospital in 2016 after a reported shooting in which Mr. Howze and another man had been wounded. An officer observed Mr. Howze’s gunshot wound and bloodstained clothing while gathering information about that shooting. The Court of Appeals concluded that police had probable cause to treat the clothing as evidence of the firearm incident then being investigated. The clothing could contain blood or DNA from someone else, gunshot residue, hair, fibers, or other trace evidence bearing upon what had occurred.

The later 2019 murder presented a separate issue. DNA testing of biological material found on the lawfully seized shirt eventually connected Mr. Howze to an unrelated homicide. The court did not hold that police anticipated that connection when they seized the shirt. It held that the original seizure was lawful because the shirt had apparent evidentiary value in the shooting investigation, and that later forensic testing of lawfully obtained biological material did not constitute another search of Mr. Howze.

There is an interesting point buried in that analysis. The evidentiary justification supporting the original seizure and the investigative purpose of the later DNA testing were not the same. According to the Court of Appeals, however, the lawful seizure of the biological material eliminated Mr. Howze’s reasonable expectation of privacy in its subsequent forensic analysis.

That is the important legal issue. The State did not need probable cause in 2016 to believe the shirt connected Howze to the later murder in 2019. It needed probable cause to believe the shirt was evidence of the shooting police were investigating at the hospital. The court then treated the later DNA analysis as permissible secondary use of biological evidence already lawfully possessed.

Police Do Not Have Unlimited Access to Hospital Patients

If you are taken to a hospital after a shooting, a serious wreck, an assault, or a fight, there is a reasonable chance an officer will show up while you are still being treated. Most people assume that a treatment room is private space and that anything happening there stays between the patient and the medical staff. That assumption does not hold up in a criminal investigation. Hospital privacy rules govern what your doctors and nurses may disclose about your care. They do not turn a treatment area into a place officers can never enter, and they do not stop an officer from seeing what is in front of him.

That distinction is where the Howze case landed. Police responded to a report that two people had been shot. Officers went to the hospital to find out what happened and to speak with the wounded. While there, an officer saw blood on the patient’s clothing and had a crime scene technician collect it. The Court of Appeals held that the officer was somewhere he had a right to be, relying in part on an earlier decision approving an officer’s presence in an emergency room while gathering evidence about a shooting. What the officer could plainly see, he could act on.

Two practical points follow for anyone in that position.

The first is that being the victim does not protect your property. The clothing in Howze was collected while he was the one who had been shot, years before anyone suspected him of anything. Bloodstained clothing can hold evidence of a violent event no matter who the wearer turns out to be, and once officers take it as evidence, they can keep it while the case remains unsolved. In that case, the clothing sat sealed in an evidence locker for years and resurfaced in a completely different investigation.

The second is that police presence in a hospital is not unlimited. Howze does not say officers may walk into any treatment room whenever they want evidence. The ruling rested on why officers were there, what they were investigating, where the officer was standing, and what was visible from that lawful position. Change those facts and the analysis can change with them. Whether officers had a lawful right to be where they were, and lawful access to the thing they took, remains part of the constitutional question in every case.

There is also something worth understanding about the conversation itself. Officers commonly arrive at the hospital to take a statement, and people who believe they are the victim usually talk freely. You are not required to give a statement, and anything you say during that conversation can be used later. If you have been injured under circumstances that police are investigating, the safer course is to get medical care first and speak with a lawyer before giving a detailed account.

Once Police Lawfully Have Your DNA, They Can Test It Later

The part of this area of law that surprises most people is not the seizure. It is what happens afterward.

There is a common assumption that DNA is different from other evidence. It feels personal in a way a gun or a phone does not. It carries information about your health, your family, your ancestry. Many people believe that even if police lawfully took something of theirs, the government still needs fresh permission before running genetic testing on it, and certainly before using the result in some unrelated case years down the road.

North Carolina law does not work that way right now.

The controlling idea comes from a 2001 decision called State v. Barkley. A man voluntarily gave police a blood sample during a murder investigation, expecting it would clear him. It did. Police later used DNA from that same sample to link him to a different crime entirely, and he argued that the second use violated his constitutional rights. The Court of Appeals disagreed.

Drawing blood is a search, and the government must comply with the Constitution to conduct a search. But once the sample has lawfully left the body, the privacy interest that made the draw a search is gone. Testing what the government already lawfully holds is not a new search. A lawfully obtained blood sample gets treated much like any other piece of physical evidence that can be sent to a laboratory.

Howze extends that reasoning to a situation with no consent at all. He never volunteered anything. Police simply seized bloodstained clothing during an investigation into a shooting where he was the wounded person. The Court of Appeals held that the difference did not matter because the analysis turns on whether the evidence was lawfully obtained, not on how cooperative the person was when it was obtained. The clothing was lawfully seized, so testing the blood on it years later added no further intrusion.

Two things flow from that, and both are worth knowing before you find yourself on the wrong side of the law.

Your genetic material can outlive the investigation it came from. Evidence collected in one case can sit in storage for years and then be pulled, tested, and compared against something in an entirely different case, in a different city, involving people you have never met. Nothing in this decision requires police to go back to a judge before making that comparison.

And the moment that decides everything happens early. Whether the government can use a DNA result usually turns on whether it lawfully got the item in the first place. If the original seizure was unlawful, the later test result may be challengeable no matter how sophisticated the laboratory work. If the original seizure was lawful, arguing about the test itself is a much harder road. That is why an experienced defense lawyer starts with how the evidence came into police hands, not with the crime lab report.

None of that means a DNA result is unbeatable. A constitutional ruling in the State’s favor says nothing about whether the sample was contaminated, whether the chain of custody holds, whether a mixed sample was interpreted correctly, whether the laboratory followed its own protocols, or what the statistical numbers actually mean. It also says nothing about when your DNA got somewhere or how it got there. Those remain fair fights.

Getting Property and Samples Back From Police

People who have been the victim of a crime commonly assume their belongings will be returned once they are released from the hospital. That is not how evidence storage works. Property collected as part of an open investigation stays in police custody, and an unsolved case is treated as still open even after years of inactivity. The witnesses in this case testified that a stalled investigation is not a closed one and that evidence is held precisely because new information may surface later. Whether property can be released, and what happens to biological material on it, depends on the status of the case, the agency’s retention policy, and the statutes governing preservation of biological evidence. Those are worth asking about early rather than assuming that time alone clears the shelf.

Can You Challenge DNA Evidence?

Everything in this decision rests on one condition. Police had the evidence lawfully. Remove that condition and the analysis changes.

If the original seizure violates the Fourth Amendment or Article I, Sections 19 or 20 of the North Carolina Constitution, a later DNA result presents a very different problem for the State.

Sometimes that is why the first questions a defense lawyer asks have nothing to do with genetics.

  • Where did the item come from?
  • Why did police have it?
  • Was the officer lawfully present?
  • Did he have lawful access to the seized evidence?
  • Was its evidentiary value actually apparent at the time, or is the State reasoning backward from what testing later revealed?

The Howze decision also does not treat all genetic testing as the same.

A related overstatement is worth heading off. It would be easy to read Howze as a case that holds DNA lasts forever and that police may keep and test whatever they have for as long as they want. How long law enforcement may retain each category of biological material, what the statutes require for preservation, and when samples must be destroyed or expunged are separate questions potentially worthy of consideration.

Motions to Suppress DNA Evidence

Howze may, in fact, change the focus of criminal defense lawyers in cases involving previously collected biological evidence.

A motion that merely argues, “My client never consented to this later DNA test,” could face a substantial obstacle when the State can establish that police already lawfully possessed the biological evidence. Howze and Barkley give prosecutors some level of cover for that general theory.

The factual and legal analysis might need to focus on other issues, such as:

  • Why did law enforcement possess the evidence?
  • Was there a warrant? Consent? Abandonment? Plain view? A statutory collection procedure?
  • Was the officer lawfully present when the evidence was observed?
  • Did police have a lawful right of access?
  • Was the evidentiary significance actually apparent at the time, or is the State using later developments to justify an earlier seizure?

Those questions would address the constitutional foundation of the evidence itself.

To be clear, a constitutional ruling does not establish that a DNA result is scientifically reliable, that the sample was uncontaminated, that chain of custody is satisfactory, that a mixture was interpreted properly, or that the statistical testimony offered by the State accurately describes the significance of the result.

Nor does a DNA association necessarily establish when biological material was deposited, how it arrived at a particular location, or what activity produced it.

Howze answers an interesting, if not a somewhat factually odd/unique, search-and-seizure question. It does not decide every evidentiary question that may accompany DNA testimony at trial.

Discarded DNA Evidence in North Carolina

Police sometimes recover biological material from a cup, straw, cigarette, food container, bottle, napkin, or other property discarded in a public place. Those cases tend to focus on abandonment, reasonable expectations of privacy, curtilage, where police obtained the item, and whether officers physically intruded into a constitutionally protected area.

Howze presents a different route to the DNA crime lab.

The State did not argue that Howze abandoned the shirt. Police affirmatively seized it as evidence during a shooting investigation and retained it. The constitutional question, therefore, began with the plain-view doctrine and lawful police possession rather than with abandonment.

Frequently Asked Questions | Warrantless DNA Testing in North Carolina

Can North Carolina police test DNA evidence without a warrant?

North Carolina police may test DNA evidence without obtaining a separate warrant when the biological material was already lawfully in their possession. The North Carolina Court of Appeals has held that once evidence containing blood or other biological material is lawfully seized, comparing that material against evidence from another investigation is not a new search requiring judicial authorization.

Can police use DNA collected during one investigation in a different criminal case?

North Carolina police can use DNA from an old case in a new one, as long as they got the evidence legally the first time. Evidence from an unsolved case can sit in a police storage locker for years. A detective working a different case can pull that item, send it to the crime lab, and compare the results to evidence in the newer case. Courts have said that does not create a new constitutional problem. What matters is whether police had a legal right to take the item back when they took it. It does not matter how much time has passed, whether you were the victim, a witness, or never charged in the first case.

Can police seize anything that might contain DNA?

Police need a lawful basis to take your property, and the possibility that an item carries DNA is not enough on its own. Before testing ever becomes an issue, the questions are whether the officer was lawfully present where the item was observed, whether its value as evidence of a crime was apparent at that moment, and whether the officer had lawful access to it. When those conditions are met, police may seize the item without a warrant and send it for testing later. When they are not, the seizure itself was unlawful, and the DNA results that followed from it remain open to challenge.

Can police seize bloody clothing from someone receiving treatment at a hospital?

Police may take bloodstained clothing from a hospital patient without a warrant when officers are lawfully at the hospital investigating a crime and blood is plainly visible from where they are standing. That can happen whether the patient is a suspect, a witness, or the person who was shot. Medical privacy rules limit what your doctors and nurses may disclose. That does not always mean a treatment room is off limits to police. Their presence may still be subject to certain limits, such as why officers were there and what they could actually see at the time.

Is DNA testing a Fourth Amendment search?

Taking biological material directly from a person, such as drawing blood or swabbing the inside of a cheek, is treated as a search under both the federal and North Carolina constitutions. Testing that material afterward is treated differently. North Carolina courts have held that once a sample has lawfully been obtained, the privacy interest that made the collection a search no longer applies, and running scientific analysis on what police already lawfully possess is not a second search requiring separate approval. The same reasoning covers biological material found on lawfully seized property, such as blood on clothing. The constitutional question is how police obtained the material, not what the crime lab did with it later.

Can you challenge DNA evidence?

DNA evidence might be challenged on several fronts. Defense counsel might question how the item was seized, whether officers had lawful access to it, how the evidence was stored and handled, whether the sample was contaminated, how a mixed sample was interpreted, whether the laboratory followed its own procedures, and whether the statistics offered at trial fairly describe what the result means. A DNA match doesn’t answer when biological material was left behind, how it got there, or what someone was doing at the time.

Can police keep DNA evidence forever?

Police retention of biological evidence depends on the status of the case and the rules governing that category of evidence, not on any single rule permitting indefinite storage. Items collected during an unsolved investigation may remain in police custody for years, because an inactive case is not treated as a closed one, and evidence held that way can be retrieved and tested long afterward. Separate statutes and agency policies address preservation requirements, destruction, and expunction for particular types of evidence and particular case outcomes. Whether a specific item may be released or must be preserved is worth asking about directly rather than assuming that time alone clears the shelf.

Does North Carolina take your DNA when you are arrested?

North Carolina takes a DNA sample at arrest for a specific list of serious offenses, not for every felony charge. The list includes murder, manslaughter, sex offenses, serious assaults, kidnapping, human trafficking, arson, burglary, armed robbery, stalking, and offenses requiring sex offender registration, along with attempts and conspiracies to commit them. The sample is usually a cheek swab taken at arrest or at fingerprinting. When someone is arrested without a warrant, the sample is not supposed to be taken until a judicial official has made a probable cause determination.

If your case is dismissed, does the State keep your DNA?

North Carolina law requires the State Crime Laboratory to remove your DNA record and destroy your sample when the case ends in your favor. That covers a dismissal, an acquittal, a conviction for only a lesser misdemeanor that does not itself require a sample, and situations where no charge was filed within the statute of limitations. Winning your case does not clear the database when the State has an independent reason to keep your DNA on file, such as a prior conviction or a separate arrest that requires collection on its own. In that situation the sample stays, even though this particular charge went away.

What is discarded DNA evidence?

Discarded DNA evidence is genetic material left behind on something a person threw away or walked away from. It might be a coffee cup dropped in a trash can, a cigarette butt left on a sidewalk, a straw, a water bottle, or a napkin. Police collect the item and send it to the crime lab because the person’s DNA is on it, and they do so without a warrant, a cheek swab, or consent

DNA Evidence | Criminal Defense in North Carolina

DNA evidence can be powerful, but the laboratory result is only one part of the case. Defense lawyers may examine how police obtained the biological material, whether they had lawful authority to possess it, what testing was performed, how the sample was handled, and what the resulting association actually proves. A DNA match or inclusion does not necessarily establish when biological material was deposited, how it reached a particular location, or whether it proves the conduct alleged. In a serious criminal case, those questions can be just as consequential as the genetic comparison itself.

Bill Powers has practiced criminal law in North Carolina courtrooms since 1992. He is a former President of the North Carolina Advocates for Justice and a recipient of the North Carolina State Bar’s John B. McMillan Distinguished Service Award. He also enjoys teaching continuing legal education programs on criminal law, evidence, and trial advocacy. Powers Law Firm represents clients in criminal cases in Charlotte and surrounding communities and may be available to help with select serious felony matters elsewhere in North Carolina. If DNA evidence is part of your case, the office can be reached at 704-342-4357.

by

Requesting a public defender before hiring a private lawyer can preserve continuous legal representation while arrangements for retained counsel proceed. If you qualify for court-appointed counsel, you generally should accept the appointment even when you expect a private lawyer to enter the case later.

Financial plans can also change quickly after an arrest. Friends or family members may promise to help with legal fees and later become unable or unwilling to provide the money. An arrest or pending criminal charge may cause a loss of employment, reduced hours, suspension from work, or other income problems. The fee for the work required may also be greater than you expected. Accepting appointed counsel if you qualify protects your legal rights and options while those financial questions are resolved.

The court case remains active during the transition. Accepting the appointment of a public defender allows appointed counsel and retained counsel to coordinate the substitution without an unnecessary gap in representation.

Continue reading

by

Google Location History now carries Fourth Amendment protection when police obtain it from Google during a criminal investigation. On June 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court held in Chatrie v. United States that police conduct a search when they acquire historical cell phone location data from Google, even when the request covers only a limited time and even though Google keeps the records on its servers.

That does not make every digital location search unlawful. It does not mean the evidence in Chatrie must be suppressed. It does not prevent police from using location data to investigate serious crimes.

Key Point | Google Location History is not routine business paperwork simply because a technology company stores it. It can reveal where a phone traveled, where it stopped, and what private places it reached. When the government demands that information, the Fourth Amendment applies.

Continue reading

by

North Carolina Rule 404(b) impeachment evidence can become a central issue in a DWI or fleeing to elude trial when a defendant testifies and the State argues that a separate incident contradicts that testimony. The Court of Appeals’ June 17, 2026 opinion in State v. Moore, No. COA25-1049, is a reminder that the decision to testify does not merely give the jury the defendant’s side of the story. It also creates room for cross-examination by the prosecutor.

TL;DR | Moore involves a trial for fleeing to elude arrest with a motor vehicle, reckless driving to endanger, speeding, operating a motor vehicle without a license, driving while impaired, and displaying an expired registration plate. The defendant testified that he was not trying to flee from law enforcement during the charged event. He said he was driving to safety because he did not want to stop on a back road without witnesses, lights, cameras, or other visible protections. That testimony created the problem.  During cross-examination, the State asked whether he would have pulled over if the encounter had happened in a city with more lights and people around. The defendant answered that he would have pulled over. The prosecutor then asked the trial judge for permission to question him about a different police encounter than the incident being tried. According to the State, that separate encounter went to credibility because it allegedly involved conduct that could be viewed as evading law enforcement even though it happened in the city. The trial court allowed the questioning but barred the State from asking about any charges from the 2024 event. The jury heard the defendant’s account of the separate encounter. The jury did not hear about charges from that event. The defendant was convicted, appealed, and argued that the questioning violated Rule 404(b) and Rule 403.  The Court of Appeals found no error.

North Carolina Rule 404(b) Impeachment Evidence | Quick Reference Chart

Continue reading
Contact Information
2412 Arty Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208
Phone: 704-342-4357

Visit Our: Charlotte Divorce or Charlotte Injury Websites

Each case is different and must be evaluated on its individual facts. Prior results are no guarantee that similar results can be achieved in future cases.

We serve clients throughout North Carolina, including, but not limited to, those in the following localities: Mecklenburg County including Charlotte; Gaston County including Gastonia; Iredell County including Statesville and Mooresville; Lincoln County including Lincolnton; and Union County including Monroe and Indian Trail. View More

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2018 – 2026, Powers Law Firm PA
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design