Accessing video evidence, body-cam, and dash-cam video in North Carolina potentially just became a lot harder to obtain. 
TL;DR Quick Take: North Carolina v. Chemuti limits how defendants can access police body-worn and dash-camera recordings. The Supreme Court held that Rule 45 subpoenas cannot compel production of law-enforcement video. Instead, defendants must file a petition under N.C.G.S. § 132-1.4A in superior court, which is the exclusive procedure for release.
The Chemuti ruling is significant because, unlike many states, North Carolina provides no traditional right to discovery in cases originating in district court.
Carolina Criminal Defense & DUI Lawyer Updates













intimidation, and coercion, allowing judges to apply the law faithfully rather than bending to public opinion or private pressure.
shooting to law enforcement was admissible as substantive evidence, even when framed as a negotiation.
Carolina?
Few areas highlight that collision more than impaired driving prosecutions involving fatalities and serious injuries.
Law. But what do those terms really mean and are they even relevant in today’s perpetual, and frankly exhausting, messaging infrastructure?
spring-fed lake that has quietly carried on its rhythms for generations.
enforcement on scene to confirm the consumption of alcohol. If you’ve been charged with driving while impaired, it’s a legitimate question to ask: