Small Large
*For additional information regarding the criterion for inclusion or membership for lawyer associations, awards, & certifications click image for link.

Should I Retain a Lawyer Near Me for Drive After Consuming < 21 Charges in NC?

police

N.C.G.S. § 20-138.3 – “Driving by person less than 21 years old after consuming alcohol or drugs” charges in North Carolina are deceptively complex, both in application and long-term consequences. In part that’s because underage drivers (< 21 years old) may also be facing allegations for DWI Driving While Impaired and other violations of the NC criminal laws such as:

  • Open Container of Alcoholic Beverage
  • Traffic Violations
    • Speeding Tickets
    • Lane Violations
    • Unsafe Movement
    • Reckless Driving Charges
  • Underage Possession of Alcohol
  • Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
  • Possession of Marijuana – Drug Charges

Another reason for you to seek legal representation for a NC “provisional licensee” violation is because of the social stigma associated with underage drinking and driving charges.

Many defense attorneys, prosecutors, and Judges in North Carolina refer to such criminal charges as “Provisional license violations” or “Underage Driving charges” or some iteration using these terms: underage, drinking, driving, and provisional licensees.

Clerks of Court in North Carolina enter the Uniform Citation information into the AOC Administrative Office of the Courts computer database as: DRIVE AFTER CONSUMING < 21

While it’s not the same as “drunk driving” or “DUI charges” in North Carolina, as some people still call NC DWI and impaired driving charges, the conditions of a judgment regularly mirror those of impaired driving, including things like:

  • Alcohol Assessment/Drug Assessment
  • Compliance with Treatment
  • Revocation of License
  • Community Service
  • Court Costs
  • Fines
  • Increased Insurance Premiums

“Provisional DWI charges, as defense lawyers often refer to them in court, are an odd blend of the NC DWI laws and traditional NC criminal laws.” Bill Powers, NC DWI Attorney

marijuana

Technically, the charges are punished as any other traditional Class 2 misdemeanor under Chapter 15A: Criminal Procedure Act in North Carolina. As such, a PJC Prayer for Judgment Continued is an option for the sentencing Judge. That simply is not available for DWI charges in North Carolina.

Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 20-179, DWI sentences require mandatory provisions and therefore preclude entry of a PJC in NC DWI charges. See: In re Tucker (1998) and In Re Greene (1979).

A 20-138.3 charge is deemed an “implied consent offense” for the purposes of testing.

Is N.C.G.S. 20-138.3 Considered a “Lesser Included Offense” of NC DWI Charges? drinking alcohol

No. Provisional licensee violations are considered separate criminal charges in North Carolina. It is a Class 2 misdemeanor that carries up to 60 days imprisonment, and is subject to the Misdemeanor Sentencing Guidelines (the “Grid”) pursuant to § 15A-1340.23.

DWI charges in North Carolina are sentenced consistent with N.C.G.S. 20-179. Check out the NC DWI Quick Reference Guide for DWI sentencing in North Carolina.

The statutory language of N.C.G.S. 20-138.3 specifically states, “It is not, in any circumstances, a lesser included offense of impaired driving under G.S. 20-138.1”

What Is a Violation of N.C.G.S. 20-138.3?

The provisional licensee violation statute is relatively straightforward as it pertains to the consumption of alcohol. If under the age of 21 (ergo the DRIVE AFTER CONSUMING < 21 moniker), no amount of alcohol is allowed to be in the driver’s body.

Odor of alcohol alone is not proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, unless the driver is offered a PBT Portable Breath Test and refuses to submit to breath testing. N.C.G.S. 20-138.3 provides protections for lawfully-obtained controlled substances when taken consistent with an appropriate amount for therapeutic purposes.

Can I Be Convicted of N.C.G.S. 20-138.3 After Smoking Marijuana?

If impaired by marijuana, to an appreciable extent, DWI charges in North Carolina under N.C.G.S. 20-138.1 could be appropriate. That’s obviously true regarding Driving Under the Influence of any impairing substance as defined under N.C.G.S. 20-4.01(48b).

Impairing substances in North Carolina include alcohol, drugs, and medicines, both illegal and legal in NC.

N.C.G.S. 20-138.3 is entitled, “Driving. . .AFTER consuming” (emphasis added). While not specifically mentioned or potentially anticipated by the statute, criminal defense lawyers would want to consider whether legal defenses may exist regarding non-impairing components of marijuana.

A plain reading of the statute suggests some level of immediacy in smoking marijuana or consuming edibles prior to the operation of a motor vehicle, or to borrow from the NC DWI laws at any “relevant time” prior to driving. See the NHTSA report of Marijuana Impaired Driving.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
I am so fortunate to have had Bill Powers on my case. Upon our first meeting, Bill insisted that through the emotions of anger, sadness, confusion, and betrayal that I remain resilient. He was available to answer questions with researched, logical, truthful answers throughout our two year stretch together. I went to any lengths for my case because he won my trust almost immediately... J.R.
★★★★★
My daughter had a second DUI and when it all seemed hopeless, Bill was able to get the charges dropped. This is a man who is extremely knowledgeable, yet still keeps his integrity which was impressive to me. He handles himself with dignity. If you hire him, you will have the best of the best, along with his expansive intellect and wisdom about the law. Lisa
★★★★★
Bill Powers’ staff has handled several traffic citations for me over the years, and they exceeded my expectations each and every time. Would highly recommend anyone faced with a traffic citation or court case contact his office and they will handle it from there. M.C.
★★★★★
Bill and his staff are flat out great. I (unfortunately) was a repeat customer after a string of tickets. These guys not only took care of the initial ticket for me, but went the extra mile and reduced my problems from 3 to just 1 (very minor one) on the same day I called back! I would recommend them to anyone. A.R.