Justia Lawyer Rating
best Lawyer
Super Lawyer - Top 100
best Lawyers
Avvo Rating 10.0
AV Preeminent
The National Trial Lawyers
The best Lawyers in America
CLEA
Advocates for Justice
Business North Carolina Legal Elite - 2023
DUI Defense
NBTA
DUI Defense Lawyers Association
*For additional information regarding the criterion for inclusion or membership for lawyer associations, awards, & certifications click image for link.

by

The relationship between mental health and the criminal justice system in North Carolina exposes structural challenges that extend mental-health-jail far beyond the walls of the courtroom. While jails are traditionally viewed as holding facilities for criminal defendants accused of crimes, it is not uncommon for people experiencing acute mental health crises to be booked into jail rather than admitted to a psychiatric or substance use treatment facility equipped to provide appropriate care.

For criminal defense lawyers and other legal professionals working in big cities like Charlotte, a significant portion of the criminal court docket touches mental health in some form—often not because the court is the proper venue, but because no better options exist. All too often, jails and courtrooms serve as a kind of revolving door for people suffering from chronic mental illness. Someone in crisis may be arrested on a low-level charge, detained, and later released, only to return to custody days or weeks later under similar circumstances.

Some defendants are charged with misdemeanors such as public intoxication, trespassing, shoplifting, or simple drug possession. Others may face more serious felony allegations, including felony assault or breaking and entering. In certain cases, the defendant may be found legally incompetent to stand trial and must wait for mental health treatment before their case can proceed.

Continue reading

by

The exclusionary rule is a foundational principle in American criminal law. While it traces its origins to federal constitutional doctrine, it now plays a central role in everyday trial practice, including in state courtrooms across North Carolina. The rule is most often encountered through motions to suppress evidence, but its reach extends further, sometimes forming the basis for a motion to dismiss when the taint of unlawful police conduct affects more than a single piece of evidence. To understand why the rule exists and how it functions, it helps to examine both its historical roots and its practical application today.

Though courts often describe the exclusionary rule as a remedy, its function is broader than that. It reflects an institutional decision to draw a line between the conduct of law enforcement and the integrity of the courts. It limits what the State may use to prosecute someone when a constitutional violation has occurred. And while it can lead to the suppression of important or even decisive evidence, the logic behind the rule rests on the idea that constitutional limits on police conduct are only meaningful if they carry enforceable consequences.

The Exclusionary Rule in Constitutional and Historical Context

Continue reading

by

When a fatal collision occurs on North Carolina’s roads, the legal system doesn’t apply a one-size-fits-all response. In cases involving loss of life, prosecutors may consider FELONY-DEATH-BY-VEHICLE-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA a range of charges depending on the circumstances. Two of the most serious offenses are Felony Death by Vehicle and Second-Degree Murder.

While both carry the weight of a felony conviction and serious sentencing exposure, they are grounded in different legal theories and involve distinct statutory frameworks.

This article examines how these charges are defined under North Carolina law, what legal elements separate them, and why the difference matters—not just to lawyers and judges, but to anyone trying to understand how the state treats fatal driving cases.

Continue reading

by

A criminal conviction in North Carolina brings consequences that extend well beyond the sentence imposed by the court. Whether the offense is classified as a CRIMINAL-CONVICTION-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA misdemeanor or a felony, the effects are not limited to fines, probation, or incarceration. A conviction can create long-term barriers that may affect your ability to find housing, secure employment, continue your education, or avoid harsher penalties if you’re ever charged again.

These long-term consequences are sometimes referred to as “collateral consequences,” but that term can understate how directly they affect everyday life. The legal process may end with a sentence, but the consequences of a conviction often continue well beyond the courtroom. Understanding those effects is important for anyone facing criminal charges, whether that involves a DUI charge in Mecklenburg or allegations of a crime like theft, such as larceny.

At Powers Law Firm, we provide thoughtful and compassionate legal representation to clients facing impaired driving charges and serious felony allegations in the Charlotte metro area, including Mecklenburg, Iredell, Union, Gaston, Lincoln, and Rowan counties. To find out if we’re available to assist with your case, call 704-342-4357 to schedule a confidential consultation.

Continue reading

by

Recent executions in South Carolina have brought renewed attention to the mechanics, costs, and constitutional questions surrounding the death penalty. In particular, the DEATH-PENALTY-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA state’s authorization of the firing squad — a method not used in decades in the United States — has raised new legal and policy questions that extend well beyond the prison walls.

While North Carolina has not carried out an execution since 2006, the subject of capital punishment remains relevant here. The issues raised by how and when a person is put to death touch on legal procedures, constitutional protections, and the broader functioning of the criminal justice system.

Death Penalty Execution Methods and the Return of the Firing Squad

Continue reading

by

A substantial number of criminal charges in North Carolina are resolved through plea bargains and negotiated pleas, rather than a jury trial. That doesn’t mean PLEA-BARGAINS-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA your case isn’t serious or that the charges are minor. It means the criminal justice system is built in a way that often encourages negotiated resolutions instead of courtroom battles.

Plea bargains are widely used, deeply embedded in legal practice, and frequently misunderstood. If you’re facing charges, understanding how plea bargains work — and why they exist — can help you make informed decisions with your lawyer.

The Art of Plea Negotiations & Plea Bargains 

Continue reading

by

A conviction for some sex offense charges in North Carolina brings long-term consequences that go far beyond jail time or probation. While any criminal conviction may affect SEX-OFFENDER-REGISTRATION-IN-NC employment, housing, and personal reputation, convictions for offenses that require sex offender registration carry additional obligations and restrictions, some imposed immediately, others lasting for years or decades.

These restrictions affect not only the person’s liberty but also their ability to live, work, and interact with others in ordinary ways. Some consequences arise from the sex offender registration statutes themselves, while others flow from supervision conditions, civil laws, or agency policies tied to registration status.

This post outlines what happens after a conviction for an offense subject to registration under North Carolina’s sex offender laws. It explains who must register, what registration involves, how long it lasts, and what limitations follow. It also reviews additional restrictions and monitoring requirements imposed after release, as well as the legal framework behind them.

Continue reading

by

Beyond an express waiver, a defendant can also lose the right to a lawyer through forfeiture in certain circumstances. Forfeiture of counsel is a doctrine that applies when a RIGHT-TO-A-LAWYER-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA defendant’s own serious misconduct effectively forfeits the right to an attorney. Unlike a waiver, which is a voluntary relinquishment of a known right, forfeiture does not require an informed choice by the defendant – it is a consequence of behavior that is incompatible with the continued services of counsel.

North Carolina appellate courts have made clear that forfeiture is reserved for severe situations and is not to be invoked lightly, given the fundamental nature of the right at stake. The North Carolina Supreme Court has emphasized that forfeiture of counsel should be found only in rare circumstances where the defendant’s actions (serious misconduct) frustrate the purpose of the right to counsel and prevent the trial from moving forward.

In other words, only when a defendant’s conduct is so egregious that it entirely undermines the fair and orderly administration of justice will a court deem the right to counsel forfeited. Examples might include assaulting one’s attorney or brazen obstruction of the proceedings.

Continue reading

by

Waiver of Counsel: Legal Framework and Standard of Reviewwaiver-of-counsel-in-north-carolina

Criminal defendants have a fundamental right to the assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I of the North Carolina Constitution. A defendant also has the right to proceed without counsel and represent himself or herself, but such waiver of counsel must be made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. North Carolina law requires trial courts to conduct a thorough inquiry before accepting a waiver of the right to counsel.

This inquiry is codified in N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242, which provides that a judge may allow a defendant to proceed pro se only after confirming that the defendant:

Continue reading

by

In North Carolina v. Capps, the North Carolina Court of Appeals examined two key issues arising from a felonious possession of stolen goods conviction: (1) whether the WHAT-IS-CONSTRUCTIVE-POSSESSION-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA-300x168 evidence was sufficient to prove the defendant’s constructive possession of stolen property; and (2) whether the trial court erred by excluding as hearsay certain testimony during cross-examination.

The published April 2025 opinion provides insight into how appellate courts analyze hearsay preservation requirements and the evidentiary threshold for constructive possession in criminal cases. The court ultimately found no error, emphasizing the importance of proper trial procedure (like making an offer of proof for excluded evidence) and outlining the incriminating circumstances that supported submitting the case to the jury. Below, we break down the court’s reasoning on each issue and highlight practical lessons for attorneys and judges handling similar evidentiary and sufficiency questions.

Facing serious felony charges can be overwhelming. At Powers Law Firm, we offer steady, experienced guidance to help navigate the legal system with clarity and care. We represent clients across the Charlotte metro region, including Union, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Gaston, Rowan, and Lincoln Counties. To talk through your situation and explore your options, call 704-342-4357.

Continue reading