Justia Lawyer Rating
best Lawyer
Super Lawyer - Top 100
best Lawyers
Avvo Rating 10.0
AV Preeminent
The National Trial Lawyers
The best Lawyers in America
CLEA
Advocates for Justice
Business North Carolina Legal Elite - 2023
DUI Defense
NBTA
DUI Defense Lawyers Association
*For additional information regarding the criterion for inclusion or membership for lawyer associations, awards, & certifications click image for link.

by

Every criminal defendant is entitled to a fundamentally fair trial. In North Carolina’s two-tier system, a defendant convicted in District Court (the lower criminal court) TRIAL-DE-NOVO-IN-NC can  seek an appeal from district criminal court to Superior Court for a fresh trial. But does this trial de novo appeal truly safeguard the right to a fair trial?

This post examines North Carolina’s two-tier criminal court structure and asks whether a trial de novo on appeal fully cures defects in the original proceeding. We explore statutory law (e.g. N.C.G.S. §§ 7A-271, 15A-1431), constitutional due process principles, and key cases – notably Ward v. Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57 (1972) – to assess if a defendant receives meaningful due process in the court of first instance. Legal professionals will recognize the tension between efficiency and fairness inherent in North Carolina’s system, and the question of whether the promise of a new trial compensates for any shortcomings at the District Court trial setting.

If you’re facing a legal issue and need clarity about the process or your next steps, call or TEXT Powers Law Firm at 704-342-4357 to see whether our defense attorneys are available to assist.

Continue reading

by

Being charged with a sex offense in North Carolina, regardless of whether there is a dismissal, can have long-term legal and personal consequences. While the formal legal CHARGED-BUT-DISMISSED obligations that apply after a conviction, such as sex offender registration or satellite-based monitoring, do not automatically attach to a pending charge, there are circumstances in which an arrest or charge alone can affect a defendant’s rights, freedom, and access to legal relief.

This post examines what happens when someone is charged with a registrable sex offense in North Carolina but is not convicted at trial or the state files a voluntary dismissal. It explains the legal significance of the charge, how it may affect pretrial release and eligibility for things like firearm rights restoration, expunction, or registration termination. It also addresses the broader consequences that can arise even when a charge is later dismissed or results in acquittal.

If you’ve been charged with a serious offense in Mecklenburg, Union, Gaston, Iredell, or Lincoln County and need to understand what that might mean for your future, call or TEXT Powers Law Firm at 704-342-4357 to see whether we’re available to assist.

Continue reading

by

Every year, the last Monday in May brings the hum of lawnmowers, the smell of grilled food, and the first inklings of summer. For Memorial-Day-Bob-Conroy many, Memorial Day is a chance to gather with family, enjoy a day off work, or take a short trip.

I understand that. I enjoy those things too. But for me, Memorial Day has come to mean something more, something quieter, and something harder to name. That has everything to do with my grandfather, Robert L. “Bob” Conroy.

My maternal grandfather, “Papa,” served as a medic in World War II. He was stationed in Okinawa, one of the most brutal and prolonged battles of the war.

Continue reading

by

Satellite-based monitoring (SBM) is a form of long-term electronic surveillance imposed by the courts in certain criminal cases Satellite-Based-Monitoring involving sex offenses in North Carolina. Although it shares some similarities with electronic monitoring during probation, SBM is not limited to a period of court supervision. It can continue for years after release from prison and, in some cases, may be imposed for life.

The purpose of satellite-based monitoring is to track the physical location of convicted offenders who are deemed to pose a higher risk of committing further offenses, particularly those involving minors or repeated sexual conduct. Since its adoption, the program has been revised in response to evolving legal challenges and constitutional concerns. As of late 2023, the laws governing SBM have changed again, lengthening some monitoring periods and clarifying eligibility standards.

This post explains what SBM is, who qualifies for it, how courts determine the length of monitoring, and what daily life looks like for those subject to the program. It also addresses the legal and constitutional context that shapes how North Carolina applies this form of surveillance.

Continue reading

by

In North Carolina, the legal obligation to register as a sex offender does not apply to every offense that involves sexual behavior. Instead, the state defines a specific group SEX-OFFENDER-REGISTRATION-IN-NC of criminal convictions, called “reportable convictions,” that trigger mandatory registration. Understanding who must register, how the law defines qualifying offenses, and how long those obligations last is essential for anyone facing charges that might carry these consequences.

This post explains the legal framework for sex offender registration in North Carolina, including how reportable convictions are defined, how aggravated status or recidivism affects the rules, and how long a person remains on the registry after registration. It also addresses related factors such as offense dates, eligibility for termination, and legal distinctions between standard and aggravated registration programs.

If you’re facing serious criminal charges in Mecklenburg, Union, Iredell, Gaston, or Lincoln County, and need to understand what’s at stake, call or TEXT Powers Law Firm at 704-342-4357. We may be available to assist.

Continue reading

by

What is Felony Death by Vehicle Under North Carolina Law?

Felony Death by Vehicle, as outlined under N.C.G.S. § 20-141.4, occurs when someone unintentionally causes the death of another while operating a motor vehicle and simultaneously commits the offense of Driving While Impaired (DWI). In other words, Felony Death by Vehicle directly ties an impaired driving offense to the fatal consequences that result from it. If you’re facing this charge in Iredell County, understanding the legal elements and consequences involved is key.

For the prosecution to establish guilt for Felony Death by Vehicle, they must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

Continue reading

by

In North Carolina, the presumption of innocence is more than a phrase. It is a legal principle that defines how the criminal justice system is supposed to treat you if you’ve innocent-until-proven-guilty been accused of a crime. But in real life, this idea is often misunderstood. You may hear it said in court, and you might even believe it should protect you. Still, once you’ve been charged, it can feel like the system assumes the opposite.

This article explains how the presumption of innocence works in practice in North Carolina, how it shapes the process, and what it means for you or a loved one facing criminal charges.

If you’ve been charged with a crime, it’s natural to have questions about how the system works. Understanding the presumption of innocence in North Carolina can help you make sense of what to expect and where to begin. If you’re looking for clarity or simply want to talk through what’s happening, you’re welcome to call or text Powers Law Firm at 704-342-4357. We may be able to help.

Continue reading

by

Defense lawyers don’t talk about it much. Not in CLEs. Not in chambers. Not even in the back halls of the courthouse, where truth slips out in whispered voices. We talk What-Defense-Lawyers-Carry-in-Court about strategies. We dissect rulings. We joke, sometimes darkly, because it keeps the walls from closing in. The emotional cost of criminal defense, the weight we carry, the doubt we swallow, the sorrow we sit beside, is something most of us keep to ourselves.

After more than thirty years as a criminal defense lawyer, I have learned that strength and sorrow are with me when I enter the well of the bar in a North Carolina Superior Court for sentencing.

You might think that I’d be used to it.

Continue reading

by

The relationship between mental health and the criminal justice system in North Carolina exposes structural challenges that extend mental-health-jail far beyond the walls of the courtroom. While jails are traditionally viewed as holding facilities for criminal defendants accused of crimes, it is not uncommon for people experiencing acute mental health crises to be booked into jail rather than admitted to a psychiatric or substance use treatment facility equipped to provide appropriate care.

For criminal defense lawyers and other legal professionals working in big cities like Charlotte, a significant portion of the criminal court docket touches mental health in some form—often not because the court is the proper venue, but because no better options exist. All too often, jails and courtrooms serve as a kind of revolving door for people suffering from chronic mental illness. Someone in crisis may be arrested on a low-level charge, detained, and later released, only to return to custody days or weeks later under similar circumstances.

Some defendants are charged with misdemeanors such as public intoxication, trespassing, shoplifting, or simple drug possession. Others may face more serious felony allegations, including felony assault or breaking and entering. In certain cases, the defendant may be found legally incompetent to stand trial and must wait for mental health treatment before their case can proceed.

Continue reading

by

The exclusionary rule is a foundational principle in American criminal law. While it traces its origins to federal constitutional doctrine, it now plays a central role in everyday trial practice, including in state courtrooms across North Carolina. The rule is most often encountered through motions to suppress evidence, but its reach extends further, sometimes forming the basis for a motion to dismiss when the taint of unlawful police conduct affects more than a single piece of evidence. To understand why the rule exists and how it functions, it helps to examine both its historical roots and its practical application today.

Though courts often describe the exclusionary rule as a remedy, its function is broader than that. It reflects an institutional decision to draw a line between the conduct of law enforcement and the integrity of the courts. It limits what the State may use to prosecute someone when a constitutional violation has occurred. And while it can lead to the suppression of important or even decisive evidence, the logic behind the rule rests on the idea that constitutional limits on police conduct are only meaningful if they carry enforceable consequences.

The Exclusionary Rule in Constitutional and Historical Context

Continue reading