Justia Lawyer Rating
best Lawyer
Super Lawyer - Top 100
best Lawyers
Avvo Rating 10.0
AV Preeminent
The National Trial Lawyers
The best Lawyers in America
CLEA
Advocates for Justice
Business North Carolina Legal Elite - 2023
DUI Defense
NBTA
DUI Defense Lawyers Association
*For additional information regarding the criterion for inclusion or membership for lawyer associations, awards, & certifications click image for link.

by

Police and prosecutors in North Carolina regularly use breath or blood test results taken after someone has been driving to prove BAC-DUI-CHARGES impairment. Questions can arise about the accuracy of the reported BAC if testing was delayed. Retrograde extrapolation attempts to estimate prior blood alcohol concentration by “back tracking,” using a combination of math and science.

Retrograde extrapolation rests on understanding the processes of how alcohol is absorbed and later eliminated by the human body – Bill Powers, DUI Defense Attorney in North Carolina 

This post breaks down the basic science behind these calculations, examines how they work, and looks at what makes them both potentially reliable and questionable in different situations.

Continue reading

by

The human body functions as a complex processing system, breaking down what we consume through a series of chemical reactions. WHAT-IS-A-HANGOVER Alcohol moves through this system in phases, from the first drink through the next morning. The effects of hangovers extend beyond the social hours of the night before, through sunrise, and into what many call “the morning after.” Scientists call this process veisalgia. The rest of us know it as a hangover.

Nature sometimes teaches hard lessons. A hangover represents your body’s response to a blood alcohol concentration and metabolizing alcohol, creating chemical compounds that continue to affect physical functions sometimes hours after the last drink. This matters because the effects can impact more than comfort – they affect motor skills, reaction times, and decision-making abilities. 

Understanding how blood alcohol content (BAC) changes over time matters. As DWI lawyers in North Carolina, we see cases where hangover symptoms mask underlying alcohol metabolism issues. Safe driving after drinking requires more than just waiting to feel better.

Continue reading

by

If you’re facing a DWI charge in North Carolina, you may have heard about DUI assessments. TheseALCOHOL-ASSESSMENTS evaluations play an important role in the legal process and can positively impact the outcome of your case.

That’s because DUI assessment is considered a statutory mitigating factor in North Carolina, which means it can potentially lead to a more favorable outcome in your case.

Moreover, completing an assessment is necessary for a pretrial limited driving privilege that, if you’re eligible, allows you to drive under certain conditions while your case is pending.

Continue reading

by

In the realm of criminal law, few constitutional protections are as fundamental as those provided by the Fourth FOURTH-AMENDMENT-RIGHTS Amendment. 

These rights, which safeguard people against unreasonable searches and seizures, are continuously interpreted and refined through court decisions. 

A recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case, State v. Warren Douglas Jackson, offers valuable insights into how these protections apply in real-world scenarios. 

Continue reading

by

The United States Supreme Court recently addressed the question of whether the Confrontation Clause of the EVIDENCE-BY-EXPERTS-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA Sixth Amendment is violated when a substitute analyst provides expert witness testimony about the results of forensic testing performed by a non-testifying analyst.

The Court held that when an expert, in this instance a substitute analyst, presents the out-of-court statements of another analyst as the basis for their own expert opinion, the statements are being offered for their truth.

This implicates the Confrontation Clause because the defendant is not able to cross-examine the original analyst about the testing procedures and results.

Continue reading

by

NITROUS OXIDE: ARE-WHIPPETS-LEGAL?

Nitrous oxide, often referred to as “laughing gas,” has long been a staple in medical and dental settings due to its anesthetic properties. However, its recreational use and distribution have become increasingly complex legal issues, particularly in North Carolina. For those concerned about potential criminal charges or simply seeking information, understanding the legal landscape surrounding nitrous oxide is valuable.

This post explores the intricate web of laws and regulations governing nitrous oxide in North Carolina and beyond.

We’ll examine where legal lines are drawn regarding personal use and distribution, and what consequences may arise from crossing these lines.

Continue reading

by

The San Diego Study, conducted in 1998, has left an indelible mark on the landscape of DUI charges in North Carolina and prosecution across the United States.  Its findings on the accuracy of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) have influenced police training, informed courtroom strategies, and shaped public policy. 

However, as with any influential study, its journey from academic research to practical application has been marked by both triumphs and challenges.

In our previous explorations, we delved into the statistical framework that underpins the San Diego Study, unpacking its methodology and key findings. We examined the nuances of its reported accuracy rates and discussed the implications of concepts like margin of error and false positives. 

Continue reading

by

In the realm of DUI law enforcement and prosecution, few studies have wielded as much influence as the 1998 San Diego Study and the resulting sobriety test data. 

This research, which aimed to validate the accuracy of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) at blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of 0.08% and below, has shaped policies, informed court decisions, and influenced the training of law enforcement officers across the United States. 

However, to truly understand the impact and implications of this study, we must look beyond the surface-level conclusions and delve into the statistical framework that underpins its findings.

Continue reading

by

The San Diego Study, conducted in 1998, stands as a cornerstone in the evaluation and validation of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) for detecting drivers with blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) at or above 0.08 grams per deciliter. 

As we delve deeper into this influential research, we move beyond the foundational understanding of SFSTs and the study’s methodology to examine its findings, statistical analysis, and far-reaching implications for DUI enforcement and defense strategies.

The impact of the San Diego Study on law enforcement practices and legal proceedings cannot be overstated – Bill Powers, DWI Defense Lawyer 

Continue reading

by

In the realm of DUI law enforcement and prosecution, few tools have garnered as much attention and controversy as Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs). 

These tests, designed to help law enforcement officers assess a driver’s level of impairment, have become a cornerstone of DUI investigations across the United States. 

However, their reliability and accuracy have long been the subject of debate among legal professionals, including judges, prosecutors, DUI defense lawyers, expert witnesses, and scientists.    

Continue reading