Articles Tagged with Powers Law Firm Charlotte

North Carolina’s concealed carry law may be on the verge of a historic change. Presently, you must still have a valid permit to carry aNorth Carolina concealed carry law infographic showing the legislative process for the 2025 permitless concealed carry bill, including the role of the legislature, governor’s veto, and override on a map of North Carolina concealed handgun. On July 29, 2025, the North Carolina Senate voted to override Governor Stein’s veto of Senate Bill 50, known as the “Freedom to Carry NC” act. In order for the law to go into effect, the NC House must also vote to override the veto by a three-fifths majority.

Until both chambers of the NC General Assembly vote to override the Governor’s veto, the existing concealed carry permit requirement remains in full force. As the law now stands, anyone who carries a concealed handgun in North Carolina without a valid permit or legal authority, is still subject to criminal prosecution.

If you are facing criminal charges, are under investigation in the Charlotte metro region, including Mecklenburg and Union County, and want more information about carrying a concealed weapon charges, contact Powers Law Firm for experienced, confidential guidance. TEXT or call now: 704-342-4357

Beyond an express waiver, a defendant can also lose the right to a lawyer through forfeiture in certain circumstances. Forfeiture of counsel is a doctrine that applies when a RIGHT-TO-A-LAWYER-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA defendant’s own serious misconduct effectively forfeits the right to an attorney. Unlike a waiver, which is a voluntary relinquishment of a known right, forfeiture does not require an informed choice by the defendant – it is a consequence of behavior that is incompatible with the continued services of counsel.

North Carolina appellate courts have made clear that forfeiture is reserved for severe situations and is not to be invoked lightly, given the fundamental nature of the right at stake. The North Carolina Supreme Court has emphasized that forfeiture of counsel should be found only in rare circumstances where the defendant’s actions (serious misconduct) frustrate the purpose of the right to counsel and prevent the trial from moving forward.

In other words, only when a defendant’s conduct is so egregious that it entirely undermines the fair and orderly administration of justice will a court deem the right to counsel forfeited. Examples might include assaulting one’s attorney or brazen obstruction of the proceedings.

Contact Information