Justia Lawyer Rating
best Lawyer
Super Lawyer - Top 100
best Lawyers
Avvo Rating 10.0
AV Preeminent
The National Trial Lawyers
The best Lawyers in America
CLEA
Advocates for Justice
Business North Carolina Legal Elite - 2023
DUI Defense
NBTA
DUI Defense Lawyers Association
*For additional information regarding the criterion for inclusion or membership for lawyer associations, awards, & certifications click image for link.

by

In North Carolina, the presumption of innocence is more than a phrase. It is a legal principle that defines how the criminal justice system is supposed to treat you if you’ve innocent-until-proven-guilty been accused of a crime. But in real life, this idea is often misunderstood. You may hear it said in court, and you might even believe it should protect you. Still, once you’ve been charged, it can feel like the system assumes the opposite.

This article explains how the presumption of innocence works in practice in North Carolina, how it shapes the process, and what it means for you or a loved one facing criminal charges.

If you’ve been charged with a crime, it’s natural to have questions about how the system works. Understanding the presumption of innocence in North Carolina can help you make sense of what to expect and where to begin. If you’re looking for clarity or simply want to talk through what’s happening, you’re welcome to call or text Powers Law Firm at 704-342-4357. We may be able to help.

Continue reading

by

Defense lawyers don’t talk about it much. Not in CLEs. Not in chambers. Not even in the back halls of the courthouse, where truth slips out in whispered voices. We talk What-Defense-Lawyers-Carry-in-Court about strategies. We dissect rulings. We joke, sometimes darkly, because it keeps the walls from closing in. The emotional cost of criminal defense, the weight we carry, the doubt we swallow, the sorrow we sit beside, is something most of us keep to ourselves.

After more than thirty years as a criminal defense lawyer, I have learned that strength and sorrow are with me when I enter the well of the bar in a North Carolina Superior Court for sentencing.

You might think that I’d be used to it.

Continue reading

by

The relationship between mental health and the criminal justice system in North Carolina exposes structural challenges that extend mental-health-jail far beyond the walls of the courtroom. While jails are traditionally viewed as holding facilities for criminal defendants accused of crimes, it is not uncommon for people experiencing acute mental health crises to be booked into jail rather than admitted to a psychiatric or substance use treatment facility equipped to provide appropriate care.

For criminal defense lawyers and other legal professionals working in big cities like Charlotte, a significant portion of the criminal court docket touches mental health in some form—often not because the court is the proper venue, but because no better options exist. All too often, jails and courtrooms serve as a kind of revolving door for people suffering from chronic mental illness. Someone in crisis may be arrested on a low-level charge, detained, and later released, only to return to custody days or weeks later under similar circumstances.

Some defendants are charged with misdemeanors such as public intoxication, trespassing, shoplifting, or simple drug possession. Others may face more serious felony allegations, including felony assault or breaking and entering. In certain cases, the defendant may be found legally incompetent to stand trial and must wait for mental health treatment before their case can proceed.

Continue reading

by

The exclusionary rule is a foundational principle in American criminal law. While it traces its origins to federal constitutional doctrine, it now plays a central role in everyday trial practice, including in state courtrooms across North Carolina. The rule is most often encountered through motions to suppress evidence, but its reach extends further, sometimes forming the basis for a motion to dismiss when the taint of unlawful police conduct affects more than a single piece of evidence. To understand why the rule exists and how it functions, it helps to examine both its historical roots and its practical application today.

Though courts often describe the exclusionary rule as a remedy, its function is broader than that. It reflects an institutional decision to draw a line between the conduct of law enforcement and the integrity of the courts. It limits what the State may use to prosecute someone when a constitutional violation has occurred. And while it can lead to the suppression of important or even decisive evidence, the logic behind the rule rests on the idea that constitutional limits on police conduct are only meaningful if they carry enforceable consequences.

The Exclusionary Rule in Constitutional and Historical Context

Continue reading

by

When a fatal collision occurs on North Carolina’s roads, the legal system doesn’t apply a one-size-fits-all response. In cases involving loss of life, prosecutors may consider FELONY-DEATH-BY-VEHICLE-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA a range of charges depending on the circumstances. Two of the most serious offenses are Felony Death by Vehicle and Second-Degree Murder.

While both carry the weight of a felony conviction and serious sentencing exposure, they are grounded in different legal theories and involve distinct statutory frameworks.

This article examines how these charges are defined under North Carolina law, what legal elements separate them, and why the difference matters—not just to lawyers and judges, but to anyone trying to understand how the state treats fatal driving cases.

Continue reading

by

A criminal conviction in North Carolina brings consequences that extend well beyond the sentence imposed by the court. Whether the offense is classified as a CRIMINAL-CONVICTION-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA misdemeanor or a felony, the effects are not limited to fines, probation, or incarceration. A conviction can create long-term barriers that may affect your ability to find housing, secure employment, continue your education, or avoid harsher penalties if you’re ever charged again.

These long-term consequences are sometimes referred to as “collateral consequences,” but that term can understate how directly they affect everyday life. The legal process may end with a sentence, but the consequences of a conviction often continue well beyond the courtroom. Understanding those effects is important for anyone facing criminal charges, whether that involves a DUI charge in Mecklenburg or allegations of a crime like theft, such as larceny.

At Powers Law Firm, we provide thoughtful and compassionate legal representation to clients facing impaired driving charges and serious felony allegations in the Charlotte metro area, including Mecklenburg, Iredell, Union, Gaston, Lincoln, and Rowan counties. To find out if we’re available to assist with your case, call 704-342-4357 to schedule a confidential consultation.

Continue reading

by

Recent executions in South Carolina have brought renewed attention to the mechanics, costs, and constitutional questions surrounding the death penalty. In particular, the DEATH-PENALTY-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA state’s authorization of the firing squad — a method not used in decades in the United States — has raised new legal and policy questions that extend well beyond the prison walls.

While North Carolina has not carried out an execution since 2006, the subject of capital punishment remains relevant here. The issues raised by how and when a person is put to death touch on legal procedures, constitutional protections, and the broader functioning of the criminal justice system.

Death Penalty Execution Methods and the Return of the Firing Squad

Continue reading

by

A substantial number of criminal charges in North Carolina are resolved through plea bargains and negotiated pleas, rather than a jury trial. That doesn’t mean PLEA-BARGAINS-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA your case isn’t serious or that the charges are minor. It means the criminal justice system is built in a way that often encourages negotiated resolutions instead of courtroom battles.

Plea bargains are widely used, deeply embedded in legal practice, and frequently misunderstood. If you’re facing charges, understanding how plea bargains work — and why they exist — can help you make informed decisions with your lawyer.

The Art of Plea Negotiations & Plea Bargains 

Continue reading

by

A conviction for some sex offense charges in North Carolina brings long-term consequences that go far beyond jail time or probation. While any criminal conviction may affect SEX-OFFENDER-REGISTRATION-IN-NC employment, housing, and personal reputation, convictions for offenses that require sex offender registration carry additional obligations and restrictions, some imposed immediately, others lasting for years or decades.

These restrictions affect not only the person’s liberty but also their ability to live, work, and interact with others in ordinary ways. Some consequences arise from the sex offender registration statutes themselves, while others flow from supervision conditions, civil laws, or agency policies tied to registration status.

This post outlines what happens after a conviction for an offense subject to registration under North Carolina’s sex offender laws. It explains who must register, what registration involves, how long it lasts, and what limitations follow. It also reviews additional restrictions and monitoring requirements imposed after release, as well as the legal framework behind them.

Continue reading

by

Beyond an express waiver, a defendant can also lose the right to a lawyer through forfeiture in certain circumstances. Forfeiture of counsel is a doctrine that applies when a RIGHT-TO-A-LAWYER-IN-NORTH-CAROLINA defendant’s own serious misconduct effectively forfeits the right to an attorney. Unlike a waiver, which is a voluntary relinquishment of a known right, forfeiture does not require an informed choice by the defendant – it is a consequence of behavior that is incompatible with the continued services of counsel.

North Carolina appellate courts have made clear that forfeiture is reserved for severe situations and is not to be invoked lightly, given the fundamental nature of the right at stake. The North Carolina Supreme Court has emphasized that forfeiture of counsel should be found only in rare circumstances where the defendant’s actions (serious misconduct) frustrate the purpose of the right to counsel and prevent the trial from moving forward.

In other words, only when a defendant’s conduct is so egregious that it entirely undermines the fair and orderly administration of justice will a court deem the right to counsel forfeited. Examples might include assaulting one’s attorney or brazen obstruction of the proceedings.

Continue reading