The United States Supreme Court recently addressed the question of whether the Confrontation Clause of the
Sixth Amendment is violated when a substitute analyst provides expert witness testimony about the results of forensic testing performed by a non-testifying analyst.
The Court held that when an expert, in this instance a substitute analyst, presents the out-of-court statements of another analyst as the basis for their own expert opinion, the statements are being offered for their truth.
This implicates the Confrontation Clause because the defendant is not able to cross-examine the original analyst about the testing procedures and results.
Carolina Criminal Defense & DUI Lawyer Updates
opportunities that college life brings. However, this exciting chapter also comes with new responsibilities and potential legal pitfalls that many students may not anticipate.
about the rules surrounding fireworks.
withdraw a guilty plea entered in 2005. 
rearview mirror.
of your rights. At the Powers Law Firm, we understand the importance of your privacy in wiretapping cases and are committed to ensuring that our clients receive legal advice they can trust.
especially given the potential ramifications on both the criminal and civil fronts.