Due to COVID-19, we are providing FREE consultations via PHONE or VIDEO conferencing for your safety and convenience. Please don't hesitate to call us if you have any questions! 877-462-3841

Justia Lawyer Rating
Best Lawyer
Super Lawyer - Top 100
Super Lawyer - Top 100
Best Lawyers
Avvo Rating 10.0
AV Preeminent
NACDA
The National Trial Lawyers
The Best Lawyers in America
Best Lawyers
CLEA
Advocates for Justice
Business North Carolina Legal Elite - 2021
DUI Defense
NBTA
*For additional information regarding the criterion for inclusion or membership for lawyer associations, awards, & certifications click image for link.

Criminal Law - Outline Part 6

By Collin B. Hardee

Download the PDF version of this outline

<< Part 5

DEFENSE:

  • NO Factual Impossibility: D would have been unable to commit the crime even if D had gone through w/ it DOES NOT prevent conviction of attempt – impossible to complete but can be attempt based on facts
    • EXCEPTIONS:
      • Legal Impossibility: actor engages in lawful conduct that he believes is illegal
      • Legality Rule
  • Renunciation/Abandonment (few courts accept)
    • Must be voluntary
    • D must manifest “voluntary and complete renunciation of the criminal purpose”

Punishment – less than crime

MPC
  1. (Result Crime): Purposefully engage in the conduct that would be criminal in circumstances as D believes them to be (required mens rea of target offense); OR
  2. (Conduct Crime): does or omits to do anything w/ PURPOSE of causing or w/ the belief that it will cause such a result, w/o further conduct on his part; OR
  3. (Incomplete): purposely does or omits to do anything that, under the circumstances as he believes them to be, is an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of crime

Actus Reus Test:

  • Substantial Step Test
    • Combination of “Proximity” and “Equivocality” test
    • Conduct meets the requirement if, under the circumstances as D believes them to be:
      1. There occurs “an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in D’s commission of the crime – substantial step corroborated w/ mental state evidence; AND
      2. the act is “strongly corroborative” of the actor’s criminal purpose
        1. Examples of Sub. Step:
          1. Lying in wait, searching for, following contemplated victim
          2. Reconnoitering the place contemplated for commission
          3. Unlawful entry of a structure, vehicle or enclosure in which it is contemplated that the crime will be committed
          4. Possession of materials to be employed, specifically designed for, or serve no lawful purpose
          5. Possess, collection of fabrication of materials to be employed in the commission of the crime, at or near the place contemplated for its commission, if has no lawful use
          6. Soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the crime

Punishment – same as attempted offense b/c culpable state of mind

DEFENSE:

Abandonment:

  1. Abandons or prevent it from occurring
  2. Conduct manifests complete/voluntary renunciation of criminal purpose

MPC: person is guilty if they agree to:

  1. Commit an offense;
  2. Attempt to commit an offense;
  3. Solicit another to commit an offense; OR
  4. Aid another in planning or commission
Merger?

Attempt

Merger – cannot be charged/convicted of BOTH attempted and completed crime

Solicitation

Merger – D who solicits another to commit a crime cannot be convicted of both solicitation and completed crime

Conspiracy

NO MERGER – always can have whether act completed or not; “Prosecutor’s darling”

Accomplice Liability (Complicity) – Partnership in Doing Wrong; Intentionally Assists Another Person in Criminal Conduct Principal in 1st Degree

Actually engage in the act or commission that constitutes the criminal offense

  • ACTOR
Principle in 2nd Degree

Incites, aids, commands, encourages the Principal and is present, either actively or constructively at the time of the crime

  • PRESENT (aiding and abetting)
Accessory Before the Fact

Person who aids, abets, or encourages the principal but are not present at the crime

  • Aiding/Abetting BEFORE

NC collapsed three under NC Gen. Stat 14-5.2: abolished distinction between accessories before the fact and principals to the commission of a felony

  • If perpetrator is justified, then there is no accomplice liability b/c there is no crime
  • If perpetrator is excused, there may still be accomplice liability
  • Mental States:
    • Must possess BOTH:
      • Intent to do an act that help assist/encourage the crime
      • Intent to assist in the crime but doesn’t have to be physical (encouragement)(gun used in crime)
  • Accomplice liability is generally liable for all crimes that are reasonably foreseeable result of contemplated crime
  • Aid must impact upon actual perpetrator but doesn’t have to be necessary for successful commission; nor does perpetrator have to be aware of assistance UNLESS it’s encouragement by accomplice
  • Accomplice can be convicted of any crime that the primary party is guilty of that is a direct result of their intentional assistance
  • Punishment is SAME as for the crime accomplice to
  • Mere presence alone is not enough, but mere presence w/ very little else will be enough

DEFENSES

  • Withdrawal/Abandonment: MUST take place before the events are unstoppable
    • Must communicate that doesn’t want to continue anymore
    • Need to take back the instrumentality
    • Tell the police in order to prevent crime
Accessory After the Fact

Person who assists principal after the crime

  • Aiding/Abetting AFTER
  1. Felony was committed by another person AND
  2. After felony committed, the person knowingly gave the principal person assistance in escaping or attempting to escape detection, arrest, or punishment
  3. Knowing that the principle committed the crime
MPC Accomplice Liability

Types

  • Principal – acting w/ requisite mens rea, actually engaging in the act or omission that causes the crime, or acts through an irresponsible or innocent agent (Innocent Instrumentality) to commit the offense
  • Accomplice – incites or abets w/ requisite intent before or during the commission of the offense. Includes solicitation and omission when a duty is present

Mens Rea

  • PURPOSEFULLY promote or facilitate in the commission of a crime – MUST act w/ culpability sufficient for the commission of the offense
  • NOTE: in jurisdictions w/ felony murder, it makes an accomplice in the conduct (underlying felony) strictly liable for the resulting death b/c he had the requisite mens rea as to the result
  • NO actual assistance for accomplice liability is necessary – agreement to aid is enough
  • Accomplice can be convicted even if the perpetrator has not yet been prosecuted, has been convicted of lesser crime, has been acquitted, or is lying
  • DOES NOT recognize the natural and probable consequence rule
  • INCLUDES the crime of attempt to aid and abet

DEFENSES:

  • Protected Class Exemption: underage girl in statutory rape – can’t be accomplice in crime that law was made to protect
  • Abandonment: An accomplice may abandon a conspiracy and thereby eliminate accomplice liability. In order to do so, the accomplice must generally 1) notify the principal that he or she is withdrawing from the conspiracy and 2) take some action to neutralize whatever steps he took to assist in the crime.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
I am so fortunate to have had Bill Powers on my case. Upon our first meeting, Bill insisted that through the emotions of anger, sadness, confusion, and betrayal that I remain resilient. He was available to answer questions with researched, logical, truthful answers throughout our two year stretch together. I went to any lengths for my case because he won my trust almost immediately... J.R.
★★★★★
My daughter had a second DUI and when it all seemed hopeless, Bill was able to get the charges dropped. This is a man who is extremely knowledgeable, yet still keeps his integrity which was impressive to me. He handles himself with dignity. If you hire him, you will have the best of the best, along with his expansive intellect and wisdom about the law. Lisa
★★★★★
Bill Powers’ staff has handled several traffic citations for me over the years, and they exceeded my expectations each and every time. Would highly recommend anyone faced with a traffic citation or court case contact his office and they will handle it from there. M.C.
★★★★★
Bill and his staff are flat out great. I (unfortunately) was a repeat customer after a string of tickets. These guys not only took care of the initial ticket for me, but went the extra mile and reduced my problems from 3 to just 1 (very minor one) on the same day I called back! I would recommend them to anyone. A.R.