Articles Tagged with civil liberties

The Debate Over Ratification and the Demand for a Bill of Rights

In the aftermath of the 1787 Constitutional Convention, the proposed United States Constitution went to the states for approval. North Carolina emerged as a critical battleground in this ratification debate. Many North Carolinians were divided between Federalists, who supported the new Constitution as written, and Anti-Federalists, who feared it granted too much unchecked power to a central government.

The absence of a clear list of guaranteed individual rights in the federal Constitution became a focal point. North Carolina’s citizensBILL-OF-RIGHTS-NC IMAGE REPRESENTING NORTH CAROLINA had fresh memories of British abuses of power before and during the Revolutionary era. They worried that without explicit protections, such as safeguards against arbitrary searches and seizures or other infringements, a new federal government might oppress the people just as past tyrannies had. This concern for fundamental liberties set the stage for North Carolina’s insistence on a Bill of Rights.

The Rule of Law is not just a value, a tradition, or a preference. It is the operating principle of RULE-OF-LAW the United States government and the foundation upon which legal rights, public institutions, and constitutional safeguards depend.

The Rule of Law in the United States does not mean that laws are always fair. It does not mean that legal outcomes are always just.

It means that law, rather than arbitrary power, determines how authority is exercised. It means that no person is above the law.

Contact Information